“”who is Michel Wade? If that’s Nathan’s soon to be ex, why is her atty Bradley?””
You’re as bad as I am....I find all the odd stuff too. I find it hard to read any further once I run into stuff like that. That is obviously a mistake....who the heck knows why that name is in the article...Bradley is Nathan Wade’s divorce attorney and former law partner. Only the writer would know who Michel is....
I’m the same.
We need a flow chart or Venn diagram or something to untangle all the players.
WADE CLAIMED BRADLEY was his divorce attorney-—but IIRC-—Bradley had to admit there was NO SIGNED CONTRACT FOR SUCH & THAT NO $$$$ EXCHANGED HANDS.
THAT WOULD BREAK THE “ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE”
People just don’t even read what they write. Pretty sad