Tulsi Gabbard speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., on Thursday, February 22, 2024.
Your entire argument is based on bullshit terminology. Trump getting in bed with a hard-core leftist like Gabbard is death to his candidacy.
I do not agree. Byron Donalds would be a far better pick. He can articulate MAGA. I don’t think Tulsi can.
“Gabbard”
A better-looking version of Hubert Humphrey?
“Like it or not, the SCOTUS does not exist to enforce anyone’s opinion on reality. They exist to conclude whether an action is or is not constitutional.”
Based on real history this is absolutely NOT TRUE. It is how it is “supposed to be” but by example it is not the case.
I wasn’t familiar with the author so I gave him the benefit of the doubt and was halfway through it when it became all too clear I’d wasted my time.
Tulsi Gabbard.
Trump would lose more voters than he’d gain.
He’d still lose Hawaii.
She’s all for abortion and every other leftist nightmare.
Anyone who’d find her appealing as a veep, is extremely unlikely to vote for Trump.
She’s the choice if you’re a Sports Illustrated fanatic.
“With Biden’s disapproval rating reaching historic lows of 59%”
I think the writer means “DISapproval... historic HIGHS”
It doesn’t really matter. They don’t care. They have their plan laid out a and are confident in the outcome.
Tulsi Gabbard is an attractive Milf liberal Hawaian Democrat. Please keep your fetishes to the bedroom, thanks.
One factor to consider is that the Democrats may be waiting to decide on whether or not to run Biden based in part on who Trump’s VP pick is. And the longer they wait, the more locked in on Biden they get, which for our side is a good thing.
Plus, the longer Trump can wait to decide, the more publicity our side gets, which for our side is a good thing.
The delusion of Devos promotes a misbegotten notion when the enemy of America is the Democrat party. Blaming problems on a globalist boogieman is just ignorant.
This is one of those “let’s move left” opinions (so that even when they lose they win).
This article is nonsense.
Article is wrong on the person but right on the gender. Trump needs the women’s vote to beat the democratic machine. He has already started to peal some of that vote away. There is really only one choice of a conservative woman with the street creds for the base and a nationally recognized figure for the independents. That is Gov. Kristi Noem.
I like Gabbard as a person. But not as a Vice President. She would make a great cabinet official where she is following the principles of the commander and chief. But she is too liberal to be a safe choice for VP.
Ben Carson
I am old enough to remember that the most conservative President ever was a converted Democrat ... Yes, Ronaldus Maximus was a former Union boss from CA. I do not doubt that Tulsi could become a conservative, I just don’t think it has happened yet. If Trump wants her as his VP, he needs to put her on a speaking tour where she walks back her previous leftist speech.
2. Trump will not select his running mate. The GOP leadership will, and they will never accept a ticket that doesn’t have at least one career GOP politician on it.
3. Kristi Noem will be the VP candidate in 2024.
Whenever I see a write use terms like, “Repuglican” in a serious context…I stop reading. That kind of language is not used to educate or persuade. It is used to communicate with the simple minded.
It’s akin to Sarah Palin talking about “The Lame Stream Media.” It’s fingernails on a chalkboard.
I would vote for Gabbard. There are a lot of things to like about her. I will never vote for Nimrata the Hindu supremacist.
I won’t vote for any ticket that has a Bernie Bot on it.