Good luck with that. During her recitation of what exactly
happened to her, she has offered up three different years
when it could have happened.
1994, 95, & 96. How can a guy possibly come up with
an alibi, if the plaintiff gets that much leeway?
She also couldn’t remember what season it was, Spring,
Summer, Fall, or Winter.
I don’t think they were able to tell the jury what her
job was, a writer of pornography with all sorts of
twisted plots.
I don’t think the jury ever heard that she also claimed
the mayor of New York had done the same thing to her.
I doubt that they are aware, that the state had to
extend the statute of limitations so the trail (or
possibly the penalty phase) could take place.
This doesn’t seem to be a sound case at all to me.
Bullseye.
Bet they couldn’t tell the jury that a woman being raped in that exact department store’s dressing room was the plot of an episode of a tv show that Carroll admitted to being a huge fan of. Or that she also admitted to being a huge fan of “The Apprentice” AFTER the “rape” supposedly happened.