Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thegagline

He will get the money back and the judgment will be reversed.

The left has worse things to throw in Trump’s path as we approach the election.


2 posted on 03/08/2024 8:42:52 AM PST by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lurk
He will get the money back and the judgment will be reversed.

Not if she spends it all first.

6 posted on 03/08/2024 8:45:01 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lurk

“He will get the money back and the judgment will be reversed.”

He will get some of the money back, but they will keep at least 10% but I would not be surprised if it is quite a bit more than that.


8 posted on 03/08/2024 8:50:01 AM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lurk

“The left has worse things to throw in Trump’s path as we approach the election.”

*************

The vicious Left. They never stop their lying, conniving and scheming.

One reason they are the way they are is because there is no resistance form the other side. They never face any real push back or consequences. And so there’s no reason for them to ever back off.


12 posted on 03/08/2024 8:53:47 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lurk

We’ll see. I read a story that the judgement was out of line for actual damages; and thus the punitive damages would also be reduced proportionately. So he may lose the case, but get closer to $70 million of it back if the money damages are reduced to something closer to reality.

There may also be a federal ex post facto law challenge. The state retroactively changed the statute of limitations on these suits. It’s pretty obvious they did that specifically to allow her case to go forward. Her case was previously dismissed because the statute of limitations had expired, so the state expanded it just for a 1 year period. That change also ensnared a lot of their people into civil suits. Some rappers/hip hop moguls in particular. Seems wildly unfair to pass a law 20 years after the fact to allow 20 year old accusations to go to court.


16 posted on 03/08/2024 8:58:48 AM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson