[frog in a pot]

I like where you are going but am uncomfortable with agreeing that a 2 party state caller can call a 1 party state and claim protection from a recording.

Trump did not (we are told) call a Florida telephone number and Fuchs was not a party to the call and did not direct the course of the discussion. Moreover, what if the phone Fuchs used for the recording this business call while she just happened to be in Florida was her GA state issued business phone with of course a GA state number?

A significant GA state interest is at risk by simply moving Fuchs a few feet across the border. 1 party state callers who wish to exercise their recording rights would now bear the burden of knowing the exact location of every party to the call before recording. {;^)

[PAR35]

I like where you are going but am uncomfortable with agreeing that a 2 party state caller can call a 1 party state and claim protection from a recording.

I'm pretty sure the answer to that is still no, but you probably need to consult a lawyer in the one party state.

I do know of cops in north Florida who would drive up to a friendly law enforcement office in southern Georgia and call drug dealers to arrange a deal. The Georgia cops got a solid arrest, the Florida cops got rid of a drug dealer. And the rural Georgia judges back in the day were not soft on foreign (as in Florida) drug dealers. But this was all years ago.

[tired&retired]

I agree. There are many complexities and the laws differ when you cross a state line.