Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/16/2024 6:13:21 AM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Twotone

Via administrative rules.


2 posted on 03/16/2024 6:21:48 AM PDT by inchworm (al )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
"...under the "open-fields doctrine," which allows police to forego warrants when they searched fields, woods, vacant lots, and other property not near a dwelling."

They might should consider wearing hunter orange while trespassing on a man's property. Wouldn't want them to get accidentally shot.


3 posted on 03/16/2024 6:23:53 AM PDT by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Sorry democrats but the law is 90% customary enforcement and 10% DA. Mining judical gild requires precedence and none exists. When the democrats lose power they certainly don’t want this to happen to them.


4 posted on 03/16/2024 6:24:19 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

My state requires that it has to be fenced, have signs posted every ten feet, and gates must be locked before they the state will recognize private property rights. The real scam comes from local city ordinances regarding “setbacks” that are considered as public property and right of way. This can be all the way up to the front door of your home including your front yard and driveways. And many also have ordinances against fencing and posting within this setback.


5 posted on 03/16/2024 6:28:36 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

“In one of the more bizarre cases of the open-fields doctrine run amok, a Connecticut couple filed a lawsuit challenging warrantless surveillance after state wildlife officials put a camera on a bear that was known to frequent the private nature reserve they run, turning the animal into a roving police drone.”

Highlighting a case like this is sensationalism and unhelpful: Unless the bear can be remotely manipulated or steered, it is simply not a drone (except to the extent the Air Force used unpiloted, preprogrammed F101s as target practice for fighter pilots).


6 posted on 03/16/2024 6:29:05 AM PDT by jagusafr ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Upending this would pot a stop to game wardens.


8 posted on 03/16/2024 6:37:06 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Property rights? What a joke. You just rent it. See what happens if you stop paying the “rent”, aka taxes.


11 posted on 03/16/2024 6:48:37 AM PDT by bicyclerepair (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

The examples they gave involved game wardens. In Texas, game wardens have always had that authority as long as they could show probable cause involving game animals or the taking of them, and they are also licensed peace officers. That’s why you would always see a game warden tagging along when local authorities were looking to bust a drug lab, pot grow, or even a distribution center out in the country. If it could be shown that the people running the illegal operation were also regular hunters, the game warden could also walk right into their house without a warrant to search for illegally taken game, or any other hunting/fishing violations. Of course, the game warden was also looking for any other illegal contraband or operation. If he saw anything else illegal, the local authorities were right there with him.


13 posted on 03/16/2024 6:57:20 AM PDT by eastexsteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Americans, in the “land of the free,” are slowly realizing that they have been imprisoned and enslaved by tyranny.


14 posted on 03/16/2024 6:59:38 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

https://www.nwestiowa.com/news/oc-appeals-ruling-on-rental-inspections/article_556a7710-9d3f-11ee-b6f7-0b30de29c243.html

here is my local battle front. Read it and join in this battle locally. right now it is under the guise of rental property. YOUR personal property is not far behind for a warrantless search.


17 posted on 03/16/2024 7:39:16 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

https://ij.org/press-release/in-win-for-privacy-rights-court-strikes-down-orange-citys-mandatory-rental-inspection/

Orange City’s ordinance permitted the city to search tenants’ homes without their consent, by obtaining an “administrative warrant,” which did not require the city to show any sort of suspicion or particularized probable cause. In Thursday’s ruling, the court held that Orange City’s mandatory inspection law violated Article 1, Section 8 of the Iowa Constitution and could not stand.

Here is organization fighting warrantless invasion of homes. support them.


18 posted on 03/16/2024 7:42:30 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

The rest they can spy into with helicopters and drones using multibeam sonar and infrared sensors.


20 posted on 03/16/2024 9:18:35 AM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
"open-fields doctrine,"

Fun fact, there is only one Federal Agency that is required to obtain a warrant to access "open fields"

The US Border Patrol.

When they passed IRCA (Immigration Reform and Control Act) they slipped in a provision requiring the BP to obtain what's called a 'Blackies Warrant' to conduct worksite enforcement.

This was done to keep the BP from conducting farm and ranch operation in the interior of the US. They had routinely been conducting such operations to remove illegal aliens from the agg workforce since the 1920.

These operations ensured citizens and legal residents received higher wages. Remember Cesar Chaves hated illegals with a passion because farmers used them to depress unions and wages.

Note: The BP was originally under the Department of Labor.

The IRCA legalized tens of thousands of illegal agg workers who promptly sought better work in fields like construction. This was the end of meddle class construction jobs.

Into this agg labor void/shortage rush an entire new generation of illegal aliens. To ensure that agg labor needs were met they forbid to BP from doing worksite enforcement without a warrant.

None of these development were a surprise to anyone at the time, they were the desired outcome from the start.

Anytime you see bipartisan immigration legislation being proposed question their motives and check the fine print. Its likely to be a snow job.

21 posted on 03/16/2024 9:41:57 AM PDT by usurper (AI was born with a birth defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

btt


24 posted on 03/16/2024 10:50:25 AM PDT by GailA (Land Grabs, Poisoned Food, KILL the COWS, Bidenomics=BIDEN DEPRESSION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Describe how near a dwelling


25 posted on 03/16/2024 11:29:40 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson