Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW
NRA vs Vullo should be a slam dunk since New York was explicitly and blatantly targeting the NRA.

Murthy v. Missouri may be a little harder due to the Biden Administration's "Nice website you have here, shame if something happened to it..." approach. But in the end there is more than enough viewpoint based censorship the both New York and the Biden Administration are going to lose.

2 posted on 03/18/2024 6:19:42 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GreenLanternCorps

Yes, they’ll lose.

But, as with voiding fiduciary responsibilities/contractual obligations of college graduates to lending institutions, no matter what SCOTUS rules, will the regime STOP?


3 posted on 03/18/2024 6:24:45 AM PDT by normbal (normbal. somewhere in socialist occupied America ‘tween MD and TN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: GreenLanternCorps

There is a chance that both cases will be 7-2. I have little hope for Jackson and Sotomayor in ruling for the NRA under any circumstances, and both probably see no harm in the government trying to “limit dis-information” on social media. Of course, both Kagan and Gorsuch are wild cards so their questions will be interesting to hear. I can’t see the others ruling for the government on either case.


4 posted on 03/18/2024 6:25:37 AM PDT by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson