Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mar-a-Lago Judge’s Stark Ruling: Jury Sees Secret Files or Trump Wins
Yahoo ^ | 3/18/24 | Jose Pagliery

Posted on 03/18/2024 10:09:24 PM PDT by CFW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: CFW

WAPO PROPAGANDA at it’s finest despicable peak.


21 posted on 03/19/2024 12:28:48 AM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Daniel Horowitz
@RMConservative
On the same day that SCOTUS blocked enforcement of the Texas sovereignty bill, it denied cert to the Indiana couple who had their child stolen for not using transgender pronouns. Once again, the federal courts are a one-way street and a dead end. They will always countermand our political gains in the states, but then in the states where the political system violates our rights, they will never be there for us. Only for the illegal invaders.


22 posted on 03/19/2024 12:28:54 AM PDT by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CFW

23 posted on 03/19/2024 12:32:35 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CFW

When alleged national security-related documents or testimony are involved in criminal cases, the due process rights of the defendant trump the prosecutors desire to keep them away from the jury.

This falls within the definition of “graymail”.

This is very common when prosecuting individuals who are associated with alleged crimes by individuals involving state secrets.

I doubt Judge Cannon just pulled this order out of thin air. Jack Smith and Trump’s attorneys must have known this order was coming out today. Judge Cannon put the ball in Jack Smith’s court and let him make the decision.

You can bet your last dollar that the DOJ and Biden White House knew this order would be coming down.

The case law is clear that the jury must be presented with the documents that allegedly violated a criminal statute. It is so clear, that no Court of Appeals is going to reverse.


24 posted on 03/19/2024 12:38:54 AM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
References:

Presidential Records (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22)

And replies 4, 6, 7, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35, 36.



25 posted on 03/19/2024 12:49:31 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Jack Smith “Judge, you can’t let the jury see them. They will see everything. They’ll see the big board!” Paraphasing Gen. “Buck” Turgidson… 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


26 posted on 03/19/2024 1:08:13 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox
Jack Smith “Judge, you can’t let the jury see them. They will see everything. They’ll see the big board!” Paraphasing Gen. “Buck” Turgidson… 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


27 posted on 03/19/2024 1:49:10 AM PDT by henbane ( WAKE UP, AMERICA! The Dems & RINOs are eating you alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

A police state as in one under Castro, Mao or Stalin.

We’re close to having a Cultural Revolution similar to what happened under Mao. A certain BHO is right in the middle of organizing it.


28 posted on 03/19/2024 1:52:11 AM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oldplayer

That was his hope. IMHO, he was probably hoping to show the redacted photos the FBI took of some folder on the floor, etc. ans say it was so sensitive, we had to redact the whole thing, here, just look at this page of blacked out text, and flash it in front of the jury and claim it was in the folder. Now, convict him, nowwwwwwwww!!!!!!!


29 posted on 03/19/2024 2:21:16 AM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

That’s what he wanted. Now to see how he responds.


30 posted on 03/19/2024 2:23:02 AM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: matt04

What is to say the FBI/CIA/CDC/FFA/FCC/DOJ/BLM or whatever slips in documents that Trump never ever had. Who is going know the truth?
These people are so corrupt it makes me puke.


31 posted on 03/19/2024 2:37:36 AM PDT by spincaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Maga friendly judge? They must mean law abiding….


32 posted on 03/19/2024 2:58:58 AM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

If the documents are redacted is that not a denial of the right face one’s accusers and the evidence against him?


33 posted on 03/19/2024 3:10:43 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: noiseman; Liz; SunkenCiv; Red Badger; Kaslin; BenLurkin; Lazamataz; governsleastgovernsbest

ALL that we have “seen” (been told by the prosecutor) as “evidence” so far is a leaked photograph of empty folders on a piece of carpet.

And democrat party claims.


34 posted on 03/19/2024 3:11:38 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

Seems like you’d have to show the evidence to the jury. Though I’m not a judge or a yahoo journalist so what do I know


35 posted on 03/19/2024 3:15:37 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

“Seems like you’d have to show the evidence to the jury. Though I’m not a judge or a yahoo journalist so what do I know”

I’m still waiting on the evidence of from Jan6 that put hundreds of law abiding citizens in prison for taking a white house tour.


36 posted on 03/19/2024 3:25:19 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump/Jennifer-Ruth Green in 24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The writers lament that the judge “MAGA friendly” is a tacit administration that its a political prosecution.


37 posted on 03/19/2024 3:46:01 AM PDT by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“...where more experienced judges have already overturned Cannon and reined her in...”

“More experienced judges”??? “Reined her in”???

How’s that for objective analysis?


38 posted on 03/19/2024 3:46:10 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

If they’re kept secrit
You must acquit


39 posted on 03/19/2024 4:01:55 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
I'm guessing the Judge has reviewed these files and know those documents are a big nothing.

There are just so many people who can mark their work as classified...a good example is Comey and his meeting with Trump.

40 posted on 03/19/2024 4:08:41 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson