[circlecity]

The Dems never get to a question they just make insulting speeches. If there is a question they cut the witness off as they begin to answer.

[PGR88]

Bobulinski had to come forward, and he had to be aggressive - otherwise he likely would have been killed long ago.

He’s protected himself with publicity.

[Steely Tom]

Alinsky's fourth Rule:

"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

And don't lose sight of Alinsky's fifth Rule:

"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."

[Dan in Wichita]

I was delighted to see Bobulinski call Raskin and Goldman liars while they were sitting there. Raskin demanded Bobulinski not be allowed to call him a liar, but Chairman Comer replied there was nothing in the House rules preventing him from speaking out in this manner.

[bigbob]

Bobulinski has no effs to give. He didn’t need any of this.

[chopperk]

All three are just plain dumb.

[ronnie raygun]

He needs to by trumps VP

[Vaduz]

Bobulinski is turning out to be the democrats next ploy on the justice system will operate witnesses answers will be selective to be admitted on record.

Communism on the march

[TChad]

While I use Wikipedia every day, and find it very useful, Wikipedia's failure to cover Tony Bobulinski stories has proved its blatant leftist bias.

As of today, this is the entirely of their Bobulinski coverage:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controversy