This we already know:
When the Hunter/Morris relationship began, Morris was playing the role of “loyal Democratic donor,” a hard-core activist, a Biden backer, who showed up when he was told. He was introduced to Hunter at a 2019 Joe Biden political fundraiser.
Soon after......as if pre-planned......the hand-picked Morris was giving Hunter legal advice AND copious amounts of money, including paying off Hunter’s long-delinquent taxes (before criminal charges were filed).
The Morris money also included paying for Hunter’s lavish lifestyle.......perhaps even Hunter’s coke addiction?
Most auspiciously, Morris was brought into the protected Biden domain during Joe Biden’s campaign for president.
On February 7, 2020, Morris bellyached how paying Hunter’s taxes was a “considerable risk personally and politically,” a veiled message to Joe Biden, calling for help......and perhaps more money to launder?
Where, in fact, did Morris get all that money he was lavishing on Hunter? Just laying around? No place to spend it.....until Hunter came along?
Morris seems now to have resolved his “political liability” of paying off Hunter’s taxes, now calling it a “loan.”
Morris’ millions are now on the table as “loans” because, if they are actually gifts, they could create a new tax problem for Hunter ......having to declare such “gifts” to the IRS.
The Morris “loans” would continue. Morris insists that it was all standard “loan” stuff. Except Morris is not a “lender,” nor a bank.
AND, he repeatedly referred to Hunter as his “client.”
cont
cont
It is increasingly hard to discern what the Morris/Biden relationship was at any given moment:
<><>Morris is a hard core Democrat, an activist, a campaign donor, a Biden backer.
<><>he was also depicted as 1. Hunter’s lender, 2. his lawyer, 3. his friend, 4. and art client
<><>whether the Morris/Biden role-playing was entirely calculated is significant
<><>the two met meeting at a Joe Biden fund-raiser in 2019,
<><>Morris said he ‘loaned’ the president’s son at least $5 million.
<><>Morris said repayment was not required til Biden’s presidential election
<><>Morris said the ‘loans’ may ultimately be forgiven.
<><>left unclear is ‘when’ Morris lent Hunter money
<><>and ‘when’ Morris took on his other Biden-protected roles.
Morris insists it was all standard ‘loan’ stuff.
<><>except Morris is not a bank, and Hunter was routinely called his legal ‘client’
The Morris/Hunter role smells of de facto campaign contributions to Joe Biden.
<><>Morris’ role-playing to shield Biden’s campaign from political liabilities is disturbing,
<><>professional ethical rules are designed to avoid a blurring of client/lawyer roles.
<><>as a member, Morris is in violation of the Calif Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct.
<><>Morris has now admitted to providing personal funds to bail out Hunter
<><>Hunter has been confirmed to be a client – or reasonably believes himself to be Morris’s client
<><>this violates the Rules of Professional Conduct and well-known norms of the legal profession.
Occam’s Razor... CIA will claim that Brandon & Hunter are actually paid informants and/or double agents.
If he does that, there must be documentation supporting that loan, to include interest payments. You can't give out noninterest bearing loans ad infinitum.
Of course, that's how it's supposed to work in real life. The rules are thrown out for Biden family and loyalists.