This was 100% obvious by a review of relevant journal articles, research contracts and forensics on the virus itself.
Do you have a list of references in the medical literature which show the experiments and data that show that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered?
Since my PhD is in biochemistry and molecular biology, I can assure you that any signs of genetic engineering of the virus are easy to find once one has the full sequence. The sequence of the original isolate of SARS-CoV-2 is available online in Genbank. You can plug that sequence into NCBI-Blast and do a search for what is called "vector contamination" in that sequence. There isn't any. (I did this already.) Other tell-tale signs of genetic engineering would be the presence of genes that are not associated with coronaviruses--there are none of those.
By the way, what I mean by "medical literature" is articles that are peer-reviewed, published in reputable journals, and indexed in PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Any journal article that describes the evidence of bio-engineering of the virus absolutely must contain the relevant sequence data and analysis that led to the conclusion that this virus originated from something other than a natural source.
The papers I reviewed were peer reviewed from journal articles and a number were actually published by the Wuhan Institute itself.
I also reviewed a DARPA proposal submitted by Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance detailing a proposal to develop bio engineered bat corona virus variant that is a pretty faithful description of the Covid -19 virus.
DARPA rejected the proposal and Daszak eventually did the work in Wuhan.
It appears that the virus was at least in part developed by the method of serial passage which would not leave the sort of markers that you describe via the analytic tools you have access to. FWIW, there seems to have been a serious cover up of the origins of the virus at the highest levels around the world, so I am generally not accepting at face value any foundational work done by any non military sources.
That includes the sequence of the "original isolate" of the SARS-CoV-2, if for no other reason that there were multiple variants of SARS-CoV-2 circulating at the outbreak of the Covid Pandemic and the relationship between the variants is pretty much what you expect from sequential iterations on a serial passage development program. This would suggest a lab release of an in process iteration of a serial passage development program
Have you done your own independent sequence of the Covid - 19 virus to verify the sequence of the "original isolate" is an accurate representation of the Covid - 19 virus ?