Wear your damned seat belt and you won’t get pulled over.
L
good, the guy fired first. I am glad they made sure he was dead.
Another innocent aspiring rap artist?
White supremacy strikes again.
Did the guy have a gun before OR after or at all the police murdered him in a rage of bullets over a seat belt?
“refusing to exit his vehicle...”
What is it about blacks refusing police direction?
There has to be more to this story.
Officers in an unmarked car pulled someone over just for a seat belt violation? I don’t think so.
If it started as a simple traffic stop, why were there suddenly five officers present?
Don’t start none, won’t be none!
How many hits and how many misses I wonder?
I question if they are telling the whole story. Garfield Park, Humboldt, Englewood are the worst neighborhoods in Chicago.
Chicago PD does not send 5 plain clothes cops into the area like this to enforce seatbelts.
If you look at the car, they have done a pit maneuver on it. Again, for a seatbelt infraction?
Anyway, interested to know more....
Absolute clown show performance of "law enforcement officers" going wild because well, they can.
I have served in direct combat and I have never seen such a wild, untrained, undisciplined mess like this before.
Now, did the alleged shooter really shoot? Was anyone hit? Did the suspect have priors? When you have a suspect trapped inside a car, he's really easy to take out- why the Meuse Argonne level volume of fire?
I guess they think you're supposed to be able to shoot first if you object to a traffic stop.
That said, a lot of these stops are simply pretexts. The cops invent a reason to stop to fish for warrants and look for a reason to do a search, i.e., "I smell marijuana." I almost never see a cop pull someone over for a traffic stop anymore, so the whole "not earing a seat belt" sounds dubious, and if it was, the whole stop was unlawful.
Socks to shoot at armed police.
Why are 5....FIVE....plain clothes cops in one car?
Why are they stopping anybody for not wearing a seat belt?
Something more is going on.
Were cops just out evil as phuck looking for fun?
Or more likely?
They thought he was somebody else, or profiled him or figured “he had to have something”........then a cop spooked and started shooting.
Why was kid really carrying a gun?
Was kid carrying a gun or did it just appear in passenger seat?
Could it be the cops shot each other....96 phreaking bullets?
Who was in charge and who trained these pussies.
I hear what sounds like a squeaky voiced DEI woman going hysterical....most of them do.
They want to play with the boys until they meet a real wolf and find out why they should of stayed in the kitchen or hospitality.
But, what do I know and I don’t feel strongly about it.
:-)
Five cops? Plain clothes cops? Unmarked car?
For a seat belt violation?
If the guy fired first he reaped the consequence of his actions.
> officers returned fire approximately 96 times over a period of 41 seconds <
The guy in the stopped car evidently fired first. So the police were justified in returning fire. And maybe all 96 shots were needed.
Yet a fundamental rule of firearm use is know what’s behind your target. I wonder where all those bullets went.
This is a mob hit. Mobbed up cops were gunning for this guy and the orders didn't come from City Hall.