“But in this particular situation with Iran. Given the facts that it was Isreal that originally attacks Irans consulate to kill that terrorist, and the fact that Irans response didn’t hurt anyone.
I would consider that an even trade of blows and call it a day. In fact, I would say Israel came out ahead on that deal.”
I may have misinterpreted your stance, but I’m not 100% certain of that. You have to know, by now.... that Iran will never stop in their goal to wipe Israel from the face of the planet. Israel knows it, we know it. Calling it a day will never work when someone fervently (insanely, viciously, etc.) wants you dead and gone.
The very fact that you see this as an “even steven” deal blows my mind, quite honestly. War is hell and the “Queensberry Rules” of fair play is only applied by a participant that has a death wish and/or doesn’t wish to win and survive.
As for Israel “coming out ahead”.... how, exactly, could that be a realistic take? Please explain how Israel profited from that, only the latest, attack on their homeland. I’m dumbfounded by the illogic.
Because Israel took out a terrorist leader and it only cost Israel the cost of those defensive rockets.
Like I said, I would have supported Israel making a glass parking lot of Gaza after their attack on Israel.
I am not an appeaser, but I am not necessary for escalating the situation with Iran that will lead to World War 3. If it were up to me the US would have taken out Iran decades ago. I am not a pacifist, I just don’t know if now is the right time to start WW3 with Pedo Joe is office.