What Our Enemies Want

The Weekly Standard | September 24,2001/Vol 7, Number 2 | Gary Schmitt and Tom Donnelly

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

What Our Enemies Want...
And what our goals should be.

President Bush was right Wednesday morning when he looked up from his cabinet meeting to announce: "The deliberate and deadly attacks which were carried out yesterday against our country were more than acts of terror. They were acts of war." But war to what end? What do the initiators of this war seek to achieve? What must we accomplish in response?

The short answer is this: Our adversaries want to push the United States out of the Middle East. Our response must be to prevent that.

This will require more than a vague, unfocused "war on terrorism." Yes, there is an informal global network of terrorists. But no one believes that this week's attacks came from Colombian "narcoterrorists," Southeast Asian drug lords, or the Russian mafia. The attacks came from the Middle East. They are the continuation of a long-running struggle to force the United States out of the region, and especially out of the Persian Gulf.

This struggle took on renewed life with the end of the Cold War, first with Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait and continuing through the 1995 Riyadh and 1996 Khobar Towers bombings in Saudi Arabia, the 1998 attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the "millennium" plot to bomb the Los Angeles airport in 1999, and the attempt last year to send the USS Cole to the bottom of the harbor in Yemen. Last week's strikes represent a new and more complex phase of this war. But this is not a new war. This is a "theater war" in the classic sense. Neither Usama bin Laden nor Saddam cares much about America's role in Europe or East Asia. They want us out of their region.

Nor is this a generalized war on American values or political principles. Yes, Saddam and Usama bin Laden despise the ideas of individual freedom and democratic government. They see our way of life as a mortal threat. But what they hate most is that America and its allies prevent them from seizing control of Saudi Arabia and the surrounding region, whether to rule in triumph or fundamentalist glory.

So the war is a struggle for power in the Persian Gulf. How can we win it?

We win by reasserting our role as the region's dominant power; as the guarantor of regional security; and as the protector of Israel, moderate Arab regimes, and the economic interests of the industrialized world. These are enduring tasks for the United States.

Our position in the Gulf has been under accelerating attack since the end of Operation Desert Storm and the decision not to remove Saddam from power in Baghdad. As Saddam has crawled back from defeat—evicting U.N. monitors, rebuilding his forces—bin Laden has grown increasingly bold. Meanwhile, our regional allies have begun to hedge their bets, not only with the terrorists and Iraq, but with Iran as well.

Any serious effort to reassert U.S. preeminence in the region must therefore be built upon a sustained campaign that addresses not just the problems of bin Laden and other terrorist organizations but the underlying strategic goal that animates them and their allied states.

To be sure, Usama bin Laden and his organization should be a prime target of this campaign. His past actions alone make him a key figure in the anti-American axis in the region, and even before September 11, he had the blood of dozens of Americans on his hands. But the larger campaign also must go after Saddam Hussein. He might well be implicated directly in this week's attacks—as he was implicated in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing—or he might not. But as with bin Laden, we have long known that Saddam is our enemy, and that he would strike us as hard as he could. And if we have learned anything at all from the past week, it is that adopting a defensive posture risks attacks with unacceptable consequences. The only reasonable course when faced with such foes is to preempt and to strike first.

More important, eliminating Saddam is the key to restoring our regional dominance and preventing our enemies from achieving their war aims. Not only has Saddam been the greatest threat to the United States, its interests, and its allies in the past, but his drive to acquire weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles makes him the great danger for the immediate future. When Bush administration officials speak of "ending" regimes that participate in the war against America, they must mean Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

Defeating the Saddam/bin Laden axis will send a broader message as well. It will deter Iran, Syria, and the other part-time members of the anti-American coalition in the Middle East, and reassure our regional friends. And it will restore the global credibility tarnished in the Clinton years. Both our friends and our enemies will be watching to see if we pass this test.

Our tactics should be appropriate to these campaign goals. In going after Usama bin Laden, we will surely have to do more than fire cruise missiles at mud huts; indeed, the idea of attempting a "precision strike" at what is very clearly a worldwide organization—he is said to operate in more than 50 countries—is nonsensical. But it will be important to eliminate his base in Afghanistan, with or without the assistance of the ruling Taliban. And just as George Bush in 1989 went not only after Manuel Noriega but the entire structure of the Panama Defense Force, so must the Bush administration now root out the bin Laden organization. This will mean an extended operation, including ground forces, and some sustained actions beyond. While it is probably not necessary to go to war with Afghanistan, a broad approach will be required. For example, any failure by the Taliban to help should be rewarded by aid to its Afghan opposition.

The campaign against Saddam Hussein must likewise be decisive, completing the job begun in 1991. Although U.S. armed forces are much smaller than they were then, so is the Iraqi army. Unless Saddam already has acquired weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles, the outcome of such a battle is almost certain. Nor need the attack await the deployment of half a million troops. Indeed, the larger challenge will be occupying Iraq after the fighting is over; even with allied help, a constabulary mission in Iraq will make the costs of operations in the Balkans pale in comparison.

Congress has already approved a "downpayment" of $40 billion in supplemental appropriations. The "lockboxes" that vitiated Bush's earlier promises to restore American military strength are yesterday's news. Winning the war will require a significant and sustained increase in defense budgets, but given the surpluses that exist, there is no impediment to such increases.

The president thus has a rare opportunity to deny our enemies their strategic goals in the Middle East and to restore American preeminence in a critical region of the world. With a clear, concrete, and coherent strategy, America can avenge the attack on our cities, restore national honor, and finally win the larger war in the Middle East.

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

Rev. David Jones on July 20,1775 said:
"The reason why a defensive war seems so awful to good people, is, they esteem it to be some kind of murder: but this is a very great mistake; for it is no more murder than a legal process against a criminal...it is the only mode left to obtain justice."

[mfulstone]

Osama Bin(t) Laden In A "Nut"shell

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

"THEN CONQUER WE MUST, FOR OUR CAUSE IT IS JUST" (Our National Anthem)

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

"THEN CONQUER WE MUST, FOR OUR CAUSE IT IS JUST" (Our National Anthem)

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

"THEN CONQUER WE MUST, FOR OUR CAUSE IT IS JUST" (Our National Anthem)

[NMC EXP]

Terrorism is simply revenge for real or imagined wrongs by people who do not have B52's and cruise missles. The result is a loss of liberty for the survivors. It's working, is it not? The congresscritters are scrambling to shred the Constitution in the aftermath of this.

Regards

J.R.

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

"THEN CONQUER WE MUST, FOR OUR CAUSE IT IS JUST" (Our National Anthem)

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

"THEN CONQUER WE MUST, FOR OUR CAUSE IT IS JUST" (Our National Anthem)

[WIMom]

As many of you know, I help with the FreeRepublic fundraisers. It is not always easy or fun sitting at a computer for hours and hours monitoring those threads. Everyone who work the threads VOLUNTEERS to do so. We send days and weeks helping to keep FreeRepublic running.

Ask yourself these questions:

Where is the first place I go to get my news?
Am I getting any benefit from FreeRepublic?
Am I learning from FreeRepublic?

FreeRepublic is not free. It costs Jim Robinson tens of thousands of dollars to keep this forum running. There are over 60,000 registered users on FreeRepublic and only 1,000 help keep this forum running. Those who do not have the ability to donate money could help by bumping the threads once in a while. Those who who do should be ashamed of yourselves. You are a FReeploader.

Go ahead, flame me. I don't care. I contribute to FreeRepublic, and I for one do not want to see this forum dead.

If everyone who registered donated one measly dollar a month, we would never have to have a fundraiser again.

FreeRepublic Fundraiser --WE WILL STAND UNITED!!!-- We NEED YOUR HELP AND PATRIOTIC POSTS! Thread 67

Donate Here by Secure Server

Or Mail your check to:

FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794


To donate By Paypal:

Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com

[MissAmericanPie]

Afghanistan is the perfect first strike, they will easily be defeated and the country handed back over to it's legitimate citizens that are hold up in the North. The legitimate Afghan government can then root out Ben Ladin while we stage for our next target.

Of course Saddam must go, he keeps pushing for nuclear capabilities and that just cannot be allowed to happen. Lybia has some giant operations going on inside a mountain, there are chemical tanks outside the cave and a defensive air strip on top of this mountain. I have seen pictures of it, hopefully we will be able to clean house while we are over there completely this time.

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

"Terrorism is simply revenge for real or imagined wrongs"

Our foreign policies have created hatred of us and now we have suffered a terible wake-up call that this hatred is not merely ideology. We blindly assumed we could meddle in the affairs of the Middle East without consequence on our soil. Now we are forced to face the reality that we, too, have made ourselves vulnerable.

[MHGinTN]

Retribution? Revenge? Justice? ... All of it and none of it. The fanatics that destroyed the WTC and murdered so many of our fellow Americans are restrained from gloating over the death of every single American only by the limits of their ability, at present; as they achieve the means for greater slaughter, they will use it. We must annihilate the terrorist networks and bases, worldwide and here in America, or live as a fractured and turmoil bound nation indefinitely. Who in their right mind would allow poisonous vipers to share their home and multiply? Who would build their home in a community of deadly vipers, leaving gaping holes in the walls and ceiling?

[NMC EXP]

re: your #11

Yup, and it's gonna get worse.

Regards

J.R.

[Nuke'm Glowing]

Dear Disney Corporation,

Please accept our gracioius thanks for your bid to begin construction of a new theme park just outside of Baghdad in 2003. We look forward to some of the new fun rides and the LARGE stream of American tourists that will visit. We apologize for the current airport's glow in the middle of the night, but that will end in about 400 years. Meanwhile, please feel free to use your new Air Force base 30 miles to the south.

Sincerely, George W. Bush

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

Of course Saddam must go

One of the greatest blunders of the last century was when we did not finish the job in the first place.

LOL,LGE

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

We must annihilate the terrorist networks and bases, worldwide and here in America, or live as a fractured and turmoil bound nation indefinitely.

"Easter terrorism...means indiscriminately to kill anything associated with the 'West' and will no doubt eagerly kill us again, huge numbers of us at a time, given the slightest opportunity." (From THE END OF ILLUSIONS, The Weekly Standard, Septembe 24, 2001 issue)

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

We must annihilate the terrorist networks and bases, worldwide and here in America, or live as a fractured and turmoil bound nation indefinitely.

"Eastern terrorism...means indiscriminately to kill anything associated with the 'West' and will no doubt eagerly kill us again, huge numbers of us at a time, given the slightest opportunity." (From THE END OF ILLUSIONS, The Weekly Standard, Septembe 24, 2001 issue)

[LoneGreenEyeshade]

We apologize for the current airport's glow in the middle of the night

With proper attire, could be a BIG attraction.

LOL,LGE

[Anticommie]

Could'nt care less what our enemies want, I want them scraped permanently from the face of this planet, and their wives and children too.

[PatiPie]

Thanks for the flag, LGE. Good article by Schmitt and Donnelly.

Rev. David Jones on July 20,1775 said: "The reason why a defensive war seems so awful to good people, is, they esteem it to be some kind of murder: but this is a very great mistake; for it is no more murder than a legal process against a criminal...it is the only mode left to obtain justice."

Well stated by Rev. Jones, and I couldn't agree with him more. We cannot mistake killing as punishment with murdering of innocent people.

Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein cannot continue to murder Americans carte blanche anytime nor anywhere. They must be brought to justice just the same as other criminals who murder.

This will be a long and difficult war, but we must stand firm and not give up hope. We have a noble goal to accomplish and we need to persevere as we've never done before.

My heart goes out to my husband's cousin whose relative died in the World Trade Center last Tuesday. It's so hard not to feel hatred toward these criminals. God have mercy on me!