Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

47 Year Old Male Died of Anthrax
FOX News | 10/22/2001

Posted on 10/22/2001 12:47:23 PM PDT by Merovingian

47 year old male who went to the Southern Maryland Hospital and died 6 hours later did die of Anthrax...preliminary tests now show.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
I guess the FBI will now come out and say this too is unrelated to 9/11. How long before it will be impossible for the Fibbies to keep pedaling that crap?

I'll send you a crisp new $20 bill if you can quote *ANY* FBI source *EVER* stating as a fact that any recent anthrax case "is unrelated" to the 9/11 attack.

Speaking of "peddling [spelled right] crap", where do you people keep getting these ridiculous accusations from?

41 posted on 10/22/2001 2:08:31 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Not really, TbV. The Merck Manual says death can occur in 48 to 72 hrs. from inhalation anthrax.

The scary part is that the postal workers were on a week's worth of Cipro, and two of them died anyway. Which leads me to believe that the Daschle letter did indeed contain weapons-grade, antibiotic-resistant strains of anthrax.

42 posted on 10/22/2001 2:09:19 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ScholarWarrior
I respectfully but enthusiastically volunteer to assist in the interrogation. Bring plastic bags and twisties. Rubber gloves. Tweezers. Hose.

Amateur... All I'm bringing is one Israeli.

43 posted on 10/22/2001 2:10:09 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian; *Anthrax_Scare_List
To find all articles tagged or indexed using

Anthrax_Scare_List

Go here:

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC) LIST

and then click the Anthrax_Scare_List topic to initiate the search! !

44 posted on 10/22/2001 2:11:48 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Can we finally rid ourselves of Tom "Tommy" Thompson?

What problems do you have with Tommy Thompson?

45 posted on 10/22/2001 2:16:52 PM PDT by Darkshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
You could probably kill some of them to convince the others to talk.........since we don't have torture or anything.

There's a classic scene in the movie "The Untouchables".

The feds raid a bunch of bootleggers (during Prohibition) and a shootout ensues. One of the bootleggers ends up dead on the porch.

When the battle dies down, the cops grab one of the bootleggers and tries to get information out of him. Sean Connery (as a tough Irish cop) starts to rough him up. Squeaky-clean fed Elliot Ness (Kevin Costner) says, "hey, none of that!", and orders him out of the room. They continue to try to get info from the bootlegger, with no success.

Outside, Sean Connery sees the dead guy on the porch, and gets an idea. He lifts the body up and slams it against the window of the room where the interrogation is going on. He yells at the corpse, "talk, talk, dammit! Tell us what we want to know! So... A tough guy, eh? I'll give you to three to start talking -- one! two! three!"

He shoots the corpse in the face, spraying its brains all over the window of the interrogation room. Then he strides back into the room, and the now terrified bootlegger yells, "ok, ok, I'll talk!!"

46 posted on 10/22/2001 2:18:27 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
When did he die and why the coverup?

*WHAT* "coverup"? Or is that just your default presumption for everything?

47 posted on 10/22/2001 2:19:58 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
I guess the FBI will now come out and say this too is unrelated to 9/11. How long
before it will be impossible for the Fibbies to keep pedaling that crap?

Please post your evidence that the same people who conducted/masterminded the 9-11
attacks also are conducting these anthrax mail attacks.

48 posted on 10/22/2001 2:20:09 PM PDT by dbbeebs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Any ideas on how to get Tom Ridge to tell the truth? I've been listening to him for a half hour and he has said absolutely NOTHING!
49 posted on 10/22/2001 2:22:07 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
"How come it's the postal workers, and NOT the recipients of the mail ???????"

You may be sorry you asked.

Let's say that Abdul the Terrorist takes 250 anthraxed envelopes and drops them into the mailbox.

They get picked up and dropped into a large sack. The sack gets emptied onto a table at the post office.

Fred the Postal Worker then picks each one up, and drops it into the sorting machine.

Each envelope has two things in common: 1) they all go down different routes, to different addresses, handled once by each postal worker along the way, and 2) they each are handled by Fred the Postal Worker.

Fred the Postal Worker receives 250 times the exposure of any other person involved in handling the envelopes. (I did not include the carrier who removed them from the mailbox, because he handled them as a unit, rather than shuffling individual envelopes around.)

Obviously this is A) conjecture, and B) rather simplified from whatever actual procedures are involved. I haven't been a postal worker for over 30 years. But I do believe that there are likely a few people in the handling chain who receive a much greater exposure -- by virtue of handling more than one envelope involved in a mass mailing.

The implication, of course, is that if this scenario is correct, there will be a lot of recipients of tainted envelopes.

As Drudge says, developing...

50 posted on 10/22/2001 2:22:13 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
How are we going to get these idiots in custody ....
to talk if we don't use some "persuasive" methods?

So if I'm in custody for suspected bank robbery you think the
cops should torture me until I confess to all unsolved robberies?

51 posted on 10/22/2001 2:23:12 PM PDT by dbbeebs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
"If someone of the stature of Tubby Kennedy were to keel over with it, you would see immediate action!"

Bystanders running like hell to avoid getting sucked by the air-undertow into the crater formed by the impact when he lands? :)

52 posted on 10/22/2001 2:24:18 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Fred the Postal Worker receives 250 times the exposure of any other person involved in handling the envelopes.

Hmmm, could be you are brilliant.
Seems to me the sh!t is about to hit the fan. Why? Because the nano-second that Daschle's office got the letter, the entire US Capitol work force got on Cipro. Questions being asked include:"Would it not be logical to trace back immediately the route this letter had taken, which would have resulted in the Brentwood postal workers getting treatment?" and "Isn't this negligence?"

53 posted on 10/22/2001 2:33:55 PM PDT by Merovingian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
Yes!
54 posted on 10/22/2001 2:37:42 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
At Trenton it wasn't the dimwit Feds who acted -- it was the local Mayor and the postal workers. They decided to get tested on mass and arranged it.

Thank G-d they didn't any longer for the *all-knowing, all-caring* federal government and postal service to act!

55 posted on 10/22/2001 2:40:13 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

correction: ... didn't wait any longer ...
56 posted on 10/22/2001 2:41:13 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
You're right. I just want the leftovers.
Parts is parts.
57 posted on 10/22/2001 2:42:42 PM PDT by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
It occurs to me that the possibility exists that since the Taliban aren't claiming credit for the anthrax, maybe someone who has access to Anthrax spores and a whole lot to gain may be responsible. If I remember correctly Clinton's buddy former Admiral Crowe received a large block of stock in the company that makes the anthrax antidote. Remember the big stink about vacinating the armed forces ?? What are your thoughts ?? Think that the FBI is looking for a domestic terrorist ?? Regards, Gypsy II
58 posted on 10/22/2001 2:44:07 PM PDT by Gypsy II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Any ideas on how to get Tom Ridge to tell the truth? I've been listening to him for a half hour and he has said absolutely NOTHING!

Bingo. Why do you think he got the job?

59 posted on 10/22/2001 2:45:40 PM PDT by Merovingian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bvw
And just where did these letter orginate? Trenton. Which means exposure may be even more important to the testing and the investigation (get it - catch the guys(gals?) before we have bigger problems!

It's time for these guys to quit "following the science" and jump in front of it!. Our national security depends on action, not reaction.

60 posted on 10/22/2001 2:46:11 PM PDT by Cherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson