Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I am confused. Here we have a theory that says that a quantum parameter is indefinite until measured. But in a pair production, measuring the quantum parameter in particle 1 fixes the value in 2, no matter what distance separates them. How are we to know that the measured quantum parameter is not actually fixed in both (but unknown) at the time of particle pair birth?
184 posted on 01/31/2002 5:23:12 PM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: GregoryFul
Thanks for your reply!

Please let me know if the following sheds any light on the question: How is spin in quantum systems a direct result of special relativity

186 posted on 02/01/2002 8:43:29 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

To: GregoryFul
I am confused. Here we have a theory that says that a quantum parameter is indefinite until measured. But in a pair production, measuring the quantum parameter in particle 1 fixes the value in 2, no matter what distance separates them. How are we to know that the measured quantum parameter is not actually fixed in both (but unknown) at the time of particle pair birth?

Fixed-but-unknown would violate other things that can be measured. QM is weird. Much of the reason for the weirdness is that the basic objects in QM are not the macroscopic things we normally deal with, but the wave function. Physicist can explain things much better than I can.

187 posted on 02/01/2002 8:52:28 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson