Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I still protest. It seems to me that it must be a presumption that a quantum parameter's value is indefinite until measured. If an electron has spin UP when measured, could it not have had spin UP prior to its being measured.

I mean, the ironic statement physicists make about quantum states: "you don't know the value of a quantum parameter until you measure it." -- well, duh? What is the evidence that the state is not a characteristic property of an individual particle before it is measured?

Any interaction that reveals this characteristic is a measurement. Otherwise the characteristic remains unknown, not necessarily indefinite -- or is there a clear argument that convinces physicists that it is indefinite, not merely unknown?

188 posted on 02/02/2002 3:39:52 PM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: GregoryFul
Speaking of irony, here's another interesting article About the Quantum Measurement Problem
189 posted on 02/02/2002 9:52:38 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson