Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Heartlander
Abiogenesis is basically an attempt to explain the
origin of life while nullifying the possibility of a creator.

Well, that didn't take long.  You can
let me off here, driver.  If abiogenisis
is correct, there is no need to add the
extra layer of having a creator.  It
is not an attempt to repudiate creators,
tooth faeries, Santa Claus, or Tinkerbell.
If abiogenisis can be demonstrated, the
need to postulate primal chimera does not arise.

3 posted on 03/23/2002 3:57:51 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gcruse
You have added nothing. Try reading the article and debating the issues rather than hurling insults. (that means reading past the first sentence)
4 posted on 03/23/2002 4:03:41 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Listening to the senseless drivel coming from certain Eastern sources. . . there must have been TWO Creators . . . one created all those Muzzle-em fanatics . . . and the other created all of us Infidels !!!
65 posted on 03/23/2002 6:45:34 PM PST by GeekDejure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson