Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stadium Naming Loses Luster for Sports Marketers
AdAge.com ^ | April 1, 2002 | Rich Thomaselli

Posted on 04/02/2002 4:28:42 PM PST by GeneD

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- The naming-rights business in professional sports, which hit a peak in the late 1990s, isn't as robust as it used to be.

In the most recent case, as the Major League Baseball season begins this week, the Houston Astros are still looking for someone to replace bankrupt energy company Enron Corp. as the naming-rights holder to its stadium.

"The doom has occurred," said Brandon Steiner, of Steiner Sports Marketing, Larchmont, N.Y. "The hits, like Enron's bankruptcy, take away from the franchise and the value. In essence, teams are starting to realize that they're sharing their name with a company they really don't know the depth and the future of."

Dubious proposition

While marketers still see the value of having their name associated with a facility, and teams still reap the financial benefit of such a relationship, more and more naming rights seem to be a dubious proposition on both sides.

"Make no mistake, the naming-rights industry will survive. It's one of the best propositions in the business of sports in terms of delivering value to both sides," said Dean Bonham, president of Denver-based Bonham Group, a sports marketing firm specializing in naming rights deals. "Having said that, we're going to see a leveling off of costs."

The Astros, who cut a 30-year, $100 million deal with Enron in 2000 to put the company's name on the stadium, earlier this month paid Enron $2.1 million to buy back the naming rights. The facility is now known as Astros Field, that is, until a new corporate sponsor can be found, and it shouldn't be long before that happens. Several major corporations have a presence in the city, including oil giant Conoco, which is already a major sponsor at the ballpark.

Not the first deal to tank

But the Enron debacle wasn't the first naming rights deal to go south.

In 1999, the Baltimore Ravens struck a then-record 20-year, $105.5 million stadium naming rights deal with the Internet firm PSINet. The company was bankrupt two years later and, two weeks ago, the Ravens bought back the naming rights from PSINet for $5.9 million.

"There has been an epic change in the naming-rights business," said Harry "Hamp" Howell, president of Cleveland-based Sports Facilities Marketing Group. "Look, there's two facilities in Philadelphia trying to sell naming rights, the Superdome [in New Orleans] is trying to peddle naming rights and there's a new football stadium in Seattle. None of these deals have been consummated. That says something."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: advertising; namingrights; professionalsports

1 posted on 04/02/2002 4:28:42 PM PST by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I got a fortune cookie once that advised me that he who climbs the tallest tree and shouts sells more apples.

So, how do I get the next-biggest ass to climb atop the formerly-known-as PSINet Stadium and piss away another 20 million dollars?

2 posted on 04/02/2002 5:33:04 PM PST by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Qualcomm got taken in San Diego -
Paid 18 Mil for 20 years of the name in 1997
The ball team bitched untill they are getting a new stadium built ( They have the right to sell it's name )
Qualcomm is now stuck with only the few season football games for publicity and even that might disappear if the Chargers bolt out of town !
3 posted on 04/02/2002 5:35:28 PM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
All I can say is thank goodness!! I was tired of seeing old baseball parks I thought I knew by name until I was corrected that it was now named after a company. No matter what boom the economy goes through again, I hope at least the marketing teams at some of these companies have the decency not to do it again
4 posted on 04/02/2002 5:37:42 PM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
"All I can say is thank goodness!! I was tired of seeing old baseball parks I thought I knew by name until I was corrected that it was now named after a company. No matter what boom the economy goes through again, I hope at least the marketing teams at some of these companies have the decency not to do it again.

Right on brother.

Even though Philips Arena has provided me and my company a lot of work, I LOATHE having to see that logo everywhere I look when I go see the Thrashers.

And to name our baseball stadium after that UN shill, ted turner, makes me ill. I would have prefered plain old Fulton co stadium.

And just what the heck is up with "Pork, The Other White Meat, 400".

5 posted on 04/02/2002 5:52:33 PM PST by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson