[DallasMike]

...reversing his "hands off" policy...

Since when did Bush have this policy? It's nothing more than a figment of the media's imagination which has suddenly acquired the status of reality.

[KC_Conspirator]

Since when did Bush have this policy? It's nothing more than a figment of the media's imagination which has suddenly acquired the status of reality.

I like Pinkerton, but I think he is off the mark. The lefties in the press (and the DNC) have always argued that Bush was not "engaged" with the middle east. He always has been engaged, but he has not signed false accords like Oslo or invited terrorists to the Wye Plantation so he could get the Nobel Peace Prize.

These same people are now calling for US troops to be placed in between Isreali's and Palestinians. I could not think of a worse policy. Did these same people claim that they were always against sending troops into these situations like in Beirut, Lebananon in the early 80's? Its like they want to run the War on Terrorism like the LBJ did the Vietnam War.

[eureka!]

This article is predicated on lies and half truths. To essentially say that W is "regressing" to the 'Toon's administration policies is folly. I guess if W has some success, this writer will credit Clinton. Not suprising coming from the LA Clymes. A pox on their dishonest houses...