Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beazley remorseful as execution date is set
The Dallas Morning News ^ | April 27, 2002 | By LEE HANCOCK / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 04/27/2002 4:01:58 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP


Beazley remorseful as execution date is set

04/27/2002

By LEE HANCOCK / The Dallas Morning News

TYLER - After an emotional Friday hearing in which he voiced remorse for the first time in court, Napoleon Beazley was sentenced to die on May 28 for the 1994 murder of a local oilman.

State District Judge Cynthia Kent set the date after speaking at length about her "principled" discomfort over imposing a death sentence for a crime that Mr. Beazley committed as a 17-year-old.

Mr. Beazley, an honors graduate from Grapeland, about 60 miles from Tyler, was sentenced to die in 1995 after a jury found him guilty of gunning down John Luttig in a botched carjacking.

*
AP
Napoleon Beazley, right, is escorted from the Smith County Courthouse in Tyler.

Mr. Luttig, 63, was shot at close range in his driveway as he and his wife, Bobbie, returned home from a Bible study. Mrs. Luttig survived by playing dead after being wounded by Mr. Beazley.

Mr. Beazley asked to address the court after being sentenced and expressed regret that members of Mr. Luttig's family were not there to hear him. He then stood weeping in chains as he asked "for everybody's forgiveness."

Beazley statement
Mr. Beazley:"I wanted to say something to certain people. As I see, it was, first and foremost, to Mrs. Luttig and her family. As I see, none of them are in the courtroom today. I want to say it anyway, and hopefully, maybe, they will hear it.

Eight years ago, I involved myself in a crime I instantly regret. I knew it was wrong. I know it is wrong now. I've been trying to make up for it ever since that moment. I've apologized ever since that moment, not just through words, but through my acts. If I didn't care about what happened to John Luttig, then I wouldn't have cared enough to change. Nobody is going to win in this situation, and if we all lose, then I know all of those losses start with me. There's a lot of people involved in this -- not just me. The Luttig family, the DA's, Tyler, Grapeland, my family, whole bunch of other people involved. People against the death penalty, for it, everybody involved.

I want everybody to know, those people, the reason ya'll are here is because of me. It's my fault. I violated the law. I violated this city, and I violated a family -- all to satisfy my own misguided emotions. I'm sorry. I wish I had a second chance to make up for it, but I don't."

Courtroom spectator: ``You don't have to be sorry, Napoleon.''

Mr. Beazley: ``But I don't. And if nothing else, I ask for everybody's forgiveness. That's all.''

"Eight years ago, I involved myself in a crime I instantly regret. I knew it was wrong. I know it is wrong now. I've been trying to make up for it ever since that moment. I've apologized ever since that moment, not just through words, but through my acts," he said.

"I want everybody to know, those people, the reason y'all are here is because of me. It's my fault. I violated the law. I violated this city, and I violated a family all to satisfy my own misguided emotions. I'm sorry. I wish I had a second chance to make up for it, but I don't."

Mr. Beazley , 25, has faced two previous execution dates. He came within hours of being put to death in August before a stay from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Just three days earlier, the U.S. Supreme Court had announced an unprecedented 3-3 deadlock that denied Mr. Beazley a federal reprieve. Three justices abstained because of personal ties to Mr. Luttig's son 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge J. Michael Luttig of Virginia.

The case has drawn international attention, including pleas for clemency from the European Union, the American Bar Association and even the district attorney in Mr. Beazley's home county because of his age and lack of prior criminal convictions.

But prosecutors have maintained that Mr. Beazley should be executed because he was an adult under Texas law when he and two accomplices came to Tyler, stalked the Luttigs' Mercedes-Benz and shot the couple because they wanted to steal a luxury car.

Many Tyler residents believed Judge Kent played a role in Mr. Beazley's 11th-hour execution stay in August because it came the day she sent a letter to Gov. Rick Perry asking that his life be spared because of his age at the time of the murder.

Local media reports last summer included speculation that Judge Kent's membership in the Roman Catholic Church which opposes capital punishment had influenced her actions.

After the Texas appeals court lifted the stay last week, Smith County District Attorney Jack Skeen said that he considered seeking the judge's recusal from the case because of concerns that her letter showed bias.

That prompted a lengthy defense Friday from the 46-year-old Republican judge. Speaking to a courtroom packed with Mr. Beazley's supporters, Judge Kent noted that state statutes allow trial judges, prosecutors and sheriffs to offer their opinions on cases being considered for clemency.

Judge Kent said she sent a letter voicing "principled objection" to the execution of a youthful offender after being asked by defense lawyers "only hours" before Mr. Beazley was scheduled to die.

She added that she faxed her letter directly to Mr. Perry because she knew that the parole board would not have time to consider it.

The governor can order a 30-day reprieve but can commute a death sentence only if the parole board recommends it. In a rare close vote, the board decided 10-6 against commutation for Mr. Beazley.

The judge said Friday that she wanted to make clear that she was not responsible for last year's execution delay, as some critics suggested. She noted that she sentenced each of the five people executed from Smith County since 1938.

"It is not that this court is some weak-kneed judge. ... If I were a judge who did not follow the law, I had many chances to be intellectually dishonest and cause actions that would've resulted in the case being reversed."

She noted that judges are required to "be obedient to the law, but we don't have to be silent about it," and she suggested repeatedly that her letter was part of an ongoing national debate on capital punishment.

"I think the courts are very bound by the constraints of the law. When it comes to mercy, I do not see that within the purview of the courts to individually dole that out as if we are gods. We are not. We're just people. Just like Mr. Luttig. Just like Mr. Beazley."

Email lhancock@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/texassouthwest/stories/042702dntexbeazley.23a3b.html


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: carjacking; deathpenalty; murder; remorse
It looks like the end of the line for all the legal maneuvers for Mr. Beazley........
1 posted on 04/27/2002 4:01:58 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
SEE YA!
2 posted on 04/27/2002 4:10:12 AM PDT by 4TheFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
He'll die peacefully,
lulled into a narcotic sleep
by lethal injection.
That's a lot better than his victim got.
3 posted on 04/27/2002 4:10:24 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
On a good day, you can see the line move.
4 posted on 04/27/2002 4:11:52 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Three justices abstained because of personal ties to Mr. Luttig's son 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge J. Michael Luttig of Virginia

I would bet that Mike Luttig was pro-death penalty prior to his father's murder, but can you imagine how he must feel now?

5 posted on 04/27/2002 4:13:16 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"Courtroom spectator". . ."you don't have to be sorry, Napoleon". . .

. . .and this means???

Cannot connect any dots from 'honor student' to killing a man (husband)point blank and attempting the same on his wife.

6 posted on 04/27/2002 4:24:26 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
He'll die peacefully, lulled into a narcotic sleep by lethal injection. That's a lot better than his victim got.

I always think of this fact while looking at this form of death. What would be only fair would be to put the person to death in the very same manner in which they took it. But then, we'd have to have people trained in stabbing, slashing, and strangling, ect. That would be a heavy burden on regular folks. I guess it's really more humane for the executioners if they can just put the guy to sleep.

7 posted on 04/27/2002 4:46:27 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I am glad that I live in Texas where if you kill someone your life is at risk when you are caught. Not only does Texas make these beasts accountable they also catch them.

I doubt that he will get much consideration from the Higher Courts considering who he killed.

8 posted on 04/27/2002 5:59:22 AM PDT by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket
"Courtroom spectator". . ."you don't have to be sorry, Napoleon". . .

. . .and this means???

That made me scratch my head too. It would have been nice if the DMN
had included a little more on who this person was that said that. Better yet,
maybe just leave it out completely......

9 posted on 04/27/2002 6:43:07 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Yes, in Texas it does move - not like in some states.......
10 posted on 04/27/2002 6:52:29 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Everybody is suddenly "remorseful" when they're facing execution. Of course life in prison is not much of a life but the inmates seem to prefer it to death. Perhaps if they were Christians, as many of them claim to be, they wouldn't fear death so much.
11 posted on 04/27/2002 7:02:34 AM PDT by Contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pete53
You gotta love Texas. You kill somebody, you get caught, you die. thats one of the reasons I love my state.
12 posted on 04/27/2002 7:33:12 AM PDT by dix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
What is this nonsense..you can almost see liberals on the edge of their seat evaluating the quality of the apology. This was a brutal murder, I remember reading about it in the paper. They pulled in the driveway, he just walked up a pumped bullets into Luttig's head, then shot the woman. There were some 8 carjackings like this in a few months, probably not the only one he did. The left's fascination of hope for killers, while ignoring the victim is satanic.

This guy should be publicly hanged.

13 posted on 04/27/2002 7:42:33 AM PDT by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
I think executions should be public, as well. There are various valid reasons for imposing the death penalty, one of which is the deterrent effect on other citizens who might contemplate a life of crime.

There is something rather sobering about watching a person die, and that is lost when we do this in private.

14 posted on 04/27/2002 7:59:45 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Mr. Beazley? That is not AP style. Reporters just write the last names after the first use of the subject's full name in an article -- when did this "Mr." stuff start?
15 posted on 04/29/2002 9:24:16 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
This article was actually written by a Dallas Morning News writer........
16 posted on 04/30/2002 2:33:11 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

Sure, he looks sorry -- sorry he was caught.

17 posted on 04/30/2002 2:46:41 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson