Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese steelmaker pays for US tariffs (Bush was right, I was wrong)
BBC ^ | 4/29/02 | staff

Posted on 04/29/2002 9:15:49 AM PDT by LarryLied

China's biggest steelmaker has seen its profits plummet as it faces what observers believe will be a flood of foreign steel into its domestic market.

Now that the US has slapped tariffs on steel imports in an attempt to protect its own industry, exporting countries are thought likely to look to China's huge and booming economy as an alternative market.

Baoshan Iron & Steel's admission that net profits for the first three months of the year were 39.5% lower than last year therefore comes at a bad time.

The company, the fourth biggest in the world by market capitalisation, said it made a profit of 547.8m yuan ($66.3m; £45.4m) for the three months, on sales which fell 2.3% to 7.09bn yuan.

Flooding in

The losses at Baosteel, as it is known, follow a 14.4% fall in profits for 2001 as a whole from the previous year.

"In the first quarter of 2002, the domestic and international steel markets were sluggish and the prices of our core products such as cold-rolled and hot-rolled steel plates fell 11% year on year," it said in a statement.

Imports have surged since the US introduced selective tariffs of up to 30%. China's newly-minted membership of the World Trade Organisation and the lower tariffs it brings with it is also encouraging other countries to get in on the act.

Baosteel is now asking for government protection.

Help is on the way, in the shape of anti-dumping investigations launched against cold-rolled steel imports from South Korea, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinastuff; chinese; freetrade; steel; tariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
This angle never occurred to me when I (and others) attacked the tariffs. While I still believe free trade is best, this does have short term advantages. Sure is shaking up China and aiding our allies in our war on terror. Any fellow free traders care to explain how this isn't in our best interests?
1 posted on 04/29/2002 9:15:49 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; howlin
The stealth president strikes again.
2 posted on 04/29/2002 9:24:25 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Any fellow free traders care to explain how this isn't in our best interests?

Oh yes, artificially high prices for everything is really really good. How could we free traders been so stoopid?

3 posted on 04/29/2002 9:25:17 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I agreed with it back when he put them into place and I still agree with it for the obvious reasons.
4 posted on 04/29/2002 9:26:16 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
...steel imports from South Korea, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.

LOL! If this is for real, and the real reason behind the steel tarrifs, it just further cements my opinion of the craftiness of this adminstration. The Clinton administration, while brash and loud, always struck me as being rather bumbling and stupid when it came to their policies, hoping the brashness and loudness would cover up for their real lack of direction and substance. The Bush administration, on the other hand, is very quiet but moves powerfully, with long range purpose, and the effects are very real.

A good comparison is to that of chess. The Clinton admin reminds me of a hustling chess player in the park, playing blitz chess for a few dollars - move fast, talk trash, be loud, and hope that your opponent misses your few obvious tricks. The Bush administration is like a grandmaster - slower, quieter, and you don't understand the purpose of all the moves, but in due time the game plan evolves and you can see the purpose of some of the moves you thought were useless before.

5 posted on 04/29/2002 9:28:04 AM PDT by egarvue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
It wasn't only free trade, it was about us making sure we have a dependable AMERICAN source of steel for our war effort.
6 posted on 04/29/2002 9:28:12 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
How could we free traders been so stoopid?

Just born that way, I suppose.

7 posted on 04/29/2002 9:28:47 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Hehehe. Do you think that the 24/7 Bush bashers will ever get it? I doubt it, because it would require a little PATIENCE, and patience is something they lack.

Thank you for flagging me. The Stealth President does indeed strike again. Ha!

8 posted on 04/29/2002 9:29:14 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Don't gloat too much Willie. There is a hidden weapon here to use against you. This is happening because China was allowed into the WTO.
9 posted on 04/29/2002 9:30:42 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Too bad we free traders can't see the genius of "minimum wage" laws for corporations -- and other forms of RINO corporate welfare.

I guess welfare and minimum wage laws only misdirect poor individuals into sloughtful behavior -- but when applied to protecting corporations -- it somehow strengthens America.

Nice pretzel logic.

10 posted on 04/29/2002 9:33:59 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
O.k., here you go. Read part of an e-mail from my brother, who works as a materials engineer in the steel business, and explain to me how you compete with these tactics without tariffs.

I asked him who was dumping the steel and how they were getting away with it. This was part of his reponse.

"The major offenders are countries like Korea, Brazil and Japan(more so before than now), who have very poor currencies and need American dollars much more than a paid work force. These countries in general also get heavy government subsidies, where rather than run insane wellfare programs they pay the steel industries to hire more people (cheap labor when it not only cost you nothing, but puts money in your pocket)."

Especially when if the U.S. supplies a subsidy it is immediately declared illegal by the WTO.

11 posted on 04/29/2002 9:34:36 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
It's ok Larry....your man enough to admit it at least..:-)

Remember CHESS NOT CHECKERS!

12 posted on 04/29/2002 9:34:43 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
It wasn't only free trade, it was about us making sure we have a dependable AMERICAN source of steel for our war effort.

Precisely. IMHO the biggest problem with the idea of free trade is that it assumes that all sides are interested only in peaceful trade.

The weakness of free trade is evident in cases where the manufacturing base for one country (the U.S.) moves to another country (China) that stands a good chance of becoming a military rival.

13 posted on 04/29/2002 9:35:35 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
slothful
14 posted on 04/29/2002 9:35:54 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: egarvue; Miss Marple
Miss Marple identified the qualities of the Bush Administration and GW early last year in actions like this.

She labeled him the Stealth President in that he and his administration worked quitely in the background. Then we would read about the accomplishment as he outfoxed the rats and their pressitutes.

She and you are right on track here re the Stealth President and his Stealth Administration.

15 posted on 04/29/2002 9:36:13 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
A high-five to us Willie.
16 posted on 04/29/2002 9:36:52 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I sorta of remember that your posts on this made sense instead of all the rhetoric from both sides on this issue.

So please refresh my old memory re your theory/replies which now appear to be coming true!

17 posted on 04/29/2002 9:38:06 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Claud
Pinkus...
18 posted on 04/29/2002 9:39:08 AM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
bttt
19 posted on 04/29/2002 9:41:29 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I don't like tariffs. But even Adam Smith argued that national security is NOT part of the "free market" nor subject to "laissez faire." This may qualify---though I emphasize MAY.
20 posted on 04/29/2002 9:41:30 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson