[okie01]

"The lead author of the Post's Whitewater lies, Susan Schmidt, reportedly attempted to get two disgruntled readers fired for writing abrasive letters to her."

I know very well how the Post treats disgruntled readers.

After the Post's ombudsperson wrote a surprisingly shallow editorial justification for the paper's failure to report on the Jesse Dirkhising case, I questioned whether they were approaching so-called "hate crimes" with an appropriate balance.

In response to my questions and comments, which were phrased in due courtesy, I got a screed accusing me of being "a racist homophobe; no different from David Duke."

The Post does not suffer criticism lightly...

[an amused spectator]

One of the strategies of Team Clinton's "legacy restoration crew" is the smearing of Susan Schmidt. They have to take her down, so they can discredit her long list of articles that exposed the criminal Clinton conspiracy for what it was.

They've been trying to get her for a number of years, including Queen Hitlary herself.

In actuality, there were a number of Post people that were basically on loan to the Clinton White House, starting with editor William Hamilton (remember his wife, Jane Mayer Hamilton, and her smear piece on Linda Tripp?) and some of his minions. I'll dig out the name of the little WP troll that Hamilton used to do the bidding of his masters in the Clinton White House in a little while and post it up.

[Timesink]

In response to my questions and comments, which were phrased in due courtesy, I got a screed accusing me of being "a racist homophobe; no different from David Duke."

You should send this into MWO, and see what sort of response you get.