Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators Urge ''Ghost Fleet'' Action
Norfolk Virginian-Pilot | May 10, 2002 | Scott Harper

Posted on 05/13/2002 12:22:39 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Virginia's two senators are urging Congress to approve $40 million next year -- nearly four times what President Bush wants to spend -- for getting rid of decrepit ships in the James River Reserve Fleet, also known as the Ghost Fleet.

In a letter to the White House released Thursday, U.S. Sens. John W. Warner and George F. Allen said the 97 old ships moored off Fort Eustis in Newport News represent ``a clear and present environmental danger to the river and the coastline.''

A federal study last November said an oil spill could spread for 50 miles, from Jamestown Island to Portsmouth, if just two ships holding heavy oil were to break apart in a storm.

The study and its potential impacts on sensitive ecological features in the area were detailed in a recent series of articles in The Virginian-Pilot.

``Should a large oil spill occur, the results would require many millions more than would be required to retire the remaining fleet,'' the two Republican senators wrote to the president on May 1. ``It is imperative that we are proactive in order to prevent a future disaster.''

An aide to Warner said Thursday that boosting Ghost Fleet money is among the senator's top priorities this year.

``We're moving hard on this, and we're doing it on a broad front,'' the aide said.

The Bush administration has proposed giving $11.1 million next fiscal year to the U.S. Maritime Administration, a branch of the Transportation Department responsible for the James River fleet and two others in Texas and California.

Pushed by congressional representatives from Hampton Roads, the House Merchant Marine Panel last month recommended spending $20 million next year, including money to convert some ships to offshore fishing and diving reefs.

Warner and Allen said $40 million is necessary to get rid of the 16 worst ships in the Ghost Fleet that show the biggest threat to spill their contents of fuel, oil, asbestos, lead and toxic PCBs. The entire fleet holds about 7.7 million gallons of petroleum products in their steel bellies.

The government estimates that it costs $2.5 million to safely scrap and dismantle a junk vessel at an American shipyard.

Following several oil spills since 1998, the state of Virginia has been trying to persuade the Maritime Administration to at least pump waste oil off the most fragile ships. The federal agency has said it can't afford the cost of about $900,000 per pump-out.

Dozens of unwanted cargo and military support ships used to be sent overseas for disposal during the 1970s and '80s. That practice all but stopped in the mid-1990s with passage of regulations that sought to protect foreign laborers and environments from exposure to American ship wastes.

Warner and Allen also argue that, without increased spending, the Maritime Administration will not meet a congressional deadline of Sept. 30, 2006, for getting rid of more than 125 obsolete ships in the Virginia, Texas and California reserves.

Officials with the Maritime Administration have said they support the president's spending proposal but certainly will take any increased funding that Congress might approve.

A final budget is expected by October or November.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Texas; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: forteustis; georgefallen; jamesriverfleet; johnwwarner; newportnews

1 posted on 05/13/2002 12:22:40 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I propose that Congress takes one of of those old garbage scows and re-commission it the USS Clinton.
2 posted on 05/13/2002 12:26:12 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
As long as they then proceed to use it for target practice. Then I'm all for it.
3 posted on 05/13/2002 12:28:52 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
The James River Reserve Fleet, also called the ghost fleet, battles the elements as it waits to be needed.

There's a fleet of ships that just sits at anchor in the James River. It is an idle fleet, one of three fleets maintained by the U.S. Maritime Administration. Officially, it is called the James River Reserve Fleet; unofficially, it is known as the dead fleet or the ghost fleet.

Records show that ships were put on reserve in the James River as early as 1898. Initially, there were two fleets — wooden ships anchored off Claremont and steel ships anchored off Mulberry Island. Maintenance workers at the time lived aboard ships for two weeks at a time.

The ships were coal burners, and all were activated during World Wars I and II. The fleet that was reestablished off Fort Eustis after the Second World War was composed largely of Liberty and Victory ships. At one time there were nearly 800 of these cargo ships.

Today, there are 97 merchant cargo ships in the James River Reserve Fleet. They await recall to service in a national emergency or to go through their natural life cycle and become scrap metal or an artificial fishing reef somewhere along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.

Ships assigned to the Ready Reserve Force are kept in a state of moderate readiness and can be activated in a matter of days or weeks as they were during Operation Desert Storm in the Persian Gulf. Ships were also withdrawn for the Korean War, the Suez Canal crisis of 1956 and the war in Vietnam.

The majority of ships in the James River Fleet are part of the National Defense Reserve Fleet, created in 1946. Most of these ships qualify as militarily useful, but not necessarily ready for rapid activation. Others have been downgraded as "scrappers."

The size of the James River Reserve Fleet has been dwindling. Five years ago there were about 145 ships in the fleet. Those that remain at anchor are in a continuous fight against rust and corrosion.

4 posted on 05/13/2002 12:31:02 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
...including money to convert some ships to offshore fishing and diving reefs

That takes money? I thought all it took was a big hole below the waterline.

5 posted on 05/13/2002 12:37:36 PM PDT by brbethke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
However, if either World war I or World war II comes back we'll have a big lead in preparedness.
6 posted on 05/13/2002 12:45:44 PM PDT by curmudgeonII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
You have to pay somebody to make the hole...
7 posted on 05/13/2002 12:48:52 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Not exactly a rapid reaction force.
8 posted on 05/13/2002 12:49:44 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I propose that Congress takes one of of those old garbage scows and re-commission it the USS Clinton.

A ship named after Clinton shouldn't be hauling garbage....

9 posted on 05/13/2002 12:53:13 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
97 old ships moored off Fort Eustis in Newport News represent ``a clear and present environmental danger to the river and the coastline.''

Not to mention that havoc caused by ghosts of old seadogs, dragging their chains through the streets of nearby towns and moaning such that a body can't get any sleep.

"Scooby Doo, Where Are You?"

10 posted on 05/13/2002 1:40:13 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
Well, the dynamite is cheap but paying a "Beltway Bandit" for the three-year Environmental Impact Statement process costs MUCHO bucks.
11 posted on 05/13/2002 1:42:13 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: brbethke
I assume that the main expense is safe disposal of the oil and other miscellaneous crap.
12 posted on 05/13/2002 1:45:55 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Asbestos insulation is a major problem with those ships.
13 posted on 05/13/2002 1:50:19 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Ghost Fleet is right.......

A Pic
14 posted on 05/13/2002 1:53:26 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

15 posted on 05/13/2002 1:58:30 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf
Asbestos insulation is a major problem with those ships.

Wet asbestos is harmless.
16 posted on 05/13/2002 2:12:49 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson