[janetgreen]

Many men are forced to pay child support even though it is proven by DNA testing that the child belongs to someone else. Ex-L.A. District Attorney Garcetti smirked about this. This Assembly bill is a small victory for men in that situation.

[Postbro1]

The chicken isn't hatched yet. There is no bounds to the insanity the Dems (& Davis) exhibit when it comes to this kind of stuff. The fact that men proven not to be the biological fathers were previously told they had to support these children was preposterous in the first place. This is one of those things that helped to move me away from my Democrat/Liberal upbringing.

[Jeff Chandler]

This is definitely flamebait.

If it's a newborn and it's not his he shouldn't have to support it. If it's past the toddler stage and he has a father-child relationship with the kid and he finds out it's not his and therefore doesn't support it... here goes... HE IS NOT A MAN. A man wouldn't ruin a kid's life because the mother is a whore; he'd continue being "Dad" to the kid.

[patriot_wes]

But critics said it would plunge more children into poverty, and Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, D-Los Angeles, said it would resurrect the "age-old double standard."

What BS, these kids have fathers! Let the mothers find them and hold the real fathers responsible. And if they don't even know who the real father is maybe they ought to be jailed until they can remember!