Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA Announces Private Security Screening Pilot Program
TSA/DOT ^ | June 18, 2002 | TSA

Posted on 06/18/2002 8:58:45 AM PDT by blackbag

June 18, 2002

The Under Secretary of Transportation for Security, John W. Magaw, today announced the five airports selected to participate in the Private Security Screening Pilot Program -- intended to test the feasibility of having private contractors perform federally supervised passenger and property screening at airports.

Airports chosen for the two-year pilot program are San Francisco International, Kansas City International, Greater Rochester International in New York, Jackson Hole Airport in Wyoming, and Tupelo Airport in Mississippi.

“The airports selected for this pilot program will be key in determining how TSA moves forward in meeting provisions under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act,” said Magaw.

The decision to select these facilities was based on a number of factors including, but are not limited to, an airports willingness to participate, selecting a balance representation from across the United States, selecting areas with variable costs of living, the availability of existing screening company resources, and a mix of business, leisure and academic passengers.

The Private Security Screening Pilot Program is designed to determine if, with proper government supervision and controls, contract screening companies can provide and maintain the passenger and property screening performance levels provided by TSA’s federal screener workforce.

TSA’s next step will be to identify qualified private screening companies that are eligible to participate in the pilot program. TSA will solicit, award, and administer screening contracts. The screening companies awarded contracts will carry out passenger and property screening services at the five pilot program airports under federal supervision. TSA will also evaluate the contractors’ performance and will make contract termination decisions. To the extent feasible, TSA will work with the airport operation to assure that the best decisions are made and that the highest level of security and service are provided at all points in this process and through out the pilot program.

The Aviation and Transportation Security Act, Section 108, requires TSA to establish the pilot program. The Act requires that the private screening company be owned and controlled by a citizen of the United States. The Act also sets forth the provision that TSA may terminate any contract entered into with a private screening company that has repeatedly failed to comply with any standard, regulation, directive, order, law, or contract applicable to hiring or training personnel or to the provision of screening at an airport. In addition, contractors are required to meet or exceed employment standards, compensation and benefits rates, and performance requirements that apply to federal security screeners.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Breaking News; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airportscreeners; airseclist; domesticsecurity; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2002 8:58:45 AM PDT by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blackbag
Private Security Screening. That's a real burning issue.

Since he likes this 'Pilot' program, I wonder if Mcgaw would be interested in selecting a couple of Airlines to test Arming the Pilots?

2 posted on 06/18/2002 9:07:31 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackbag
I bet SF was choosen because over half of the security employees are NOT US citizens and to place the 'unfair' burden of having US citizens as security personel on the airport would not be PC.
3 posted on 06/18/2002 9:16:52 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
"SF was choosen because over half of the security employees are NOT US citizens "

good question....

4 posted on 06/18/2002 11:10:38 AM PDT by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *AirSec_list
ping
5 posted on 06/18/2002 11:44:03 AM PDT by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Curious to see if the Firm" Argabright Security" will be allowed to participate....
I hope not.
6 posted on 06/18/2002 11:47:21 AM PDT by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blackbag
Back to square one!
7 posted on 06/18/2002 6:14:37 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackbag
I gotta toot my own horn a bit reference post #2. C-SPAN just covered a story from today's Washinton Bleep about a bill to be introduced in Congress that would allow 250 airline pilots to be armed in a two-year study. The number would be expanded to 1400 after one year. This is good news.
8 posted on 06/19/2002 5:54:43 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
good news if it makes it out of the senate and gets signed by W...
9 posted on 06/19/2002 7:31:24 AM PDT by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blackbag
I lived in Tupelo, MS a number of years in the 70's. The airport had one man who checked you in, checked your bags, talked the pilots down and guided the plane when it was on the ground. I swear he wore a different hat for each job.

On the plane, the stewardesses passed out chewing gum when the plane took off. I hope they are a little more hi-tech now.

10 posted on 06/19/2002 8:45:51 AM PDT by goosie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackbag
REPLACE THE METAL DETECTORS AND GET THE EDS MACHINES MOVING! Stop wasting our money!
11 posted on 06/19/2002 5:34:20 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
"I gotta toot my own horn a bit reference post #2. C-SPAN just covered a story from today's Washinton Bleep about a bill to be introduced in Congress that would allow 250 airline pilots to be armed in a two-year study. The number would be expanded to 1400 after one year. This is good news."

Another waste! More politics and plainly S T U P I D! If Pilots want to become cops they should take the civil service test. I dare anyone to come up with a REAL (Non-NRA) study that shows me this makes any sense and will add to the protection of the aircraft.

PS! To take the wind out of your sails I am 210% behind the Second Amendment.

12 posted on 06/19/2002 5:39:16 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
PS! To take the wind out of your sails I am 210% behind the Second Amendment.

210% behind the Second Amendment (except for pilots in cockpits as the last line of defense that may mean the difference between life or death for hundreds of innocent people).

That 2nd Amendment?

13 posted on 06/19/2002 5:50:34 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
"210% behind the Second Amendment (except for pilots in cockpits as the last line of defense that may mean the difference between life or death for hundreds of innocent people)."

Absolute NONSENSE! We are talking CQB here. What you think someone masters this by busting caps once a month? There are other divises that can be used. Why doesn't Israel arm their pilots?

14 posted on 06/19/2002 5:58:10 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
PS: That's NOT THE SECOND AMENDMENT!
15 posted on 06/19/2002 5:59:06 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
There are other divises that can be used.

Stun guns? Fire Ax? Bare Fists?

Why doesn't Israel arm their pilots?

Probably because you can be assured there is more than enough guns in the cabin of one of their airliners.

16 posted on 06/19/2002 6:07:36 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
there are
17 posted on 06/19/2002 6:09:00 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
"Stun guns? Fire Ax? Bare Fists?"

One plane thinking! Try a Green Laser!

"Why doesn't Israel arm their pilots? Probably because you can be assured there is more than enough guns in the cabin of one of their airliners."

You may think so? This is also nonsense. The Israeli's profile and then will strip search you, your bags, your dog and your kids if they think you even have terrorism in your family blood line. Yes they have trained armed critters on aircraft and still have accidents, of course you don't jear about these, but they put a lot of focus on getting you before you board.

18 posted on 06/19/2002 6:20:30 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
This is also nonsense.

You like that word, "Nonsense," I've noticed.

Beating your chest is not going to change my mind. I am a former military pilot and a former airline pilot. In today's environment I would feel more comfortable packing a weapon if I were in the cockpit. As a very occasional passenger, I would feel more comfortable knowing that the pilots on my airplane would have the chance to splatter some brains all over first class if it became necessary.

19 posted on 06/19/2002 6:28:48 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blackbag
Bout time!!!
20 posted on 06/19/2002 6:29:48 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson