Skip to comments.
America: A Free Economy, a Prosperous Nation
Fox News ^
| July 04, 2002
| Radley Balko
Posted on 07/05/2002 5:05:20 PM PDT by wooden nickel
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:34:05 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
A couple of years ago, the late economist and eternal optimist Julian Simon co-authored a book, It
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: juliansimon; stevemoore
To: wooden nickel
Everything is relative. When I was a kid, a man could support a family with his wife staying home and raising the kids. Right or wrong, that is no longer the norm in the USA.
So is this still the best country in the world? Sure - but compared to what? Slave labor in China? Euro-socialism?
2
posted on
07/05/2002 5:18:06 PM PDT
by
Sabatier
To: wooden nickel
America: fat, dumb, and happy, and losing more of their freedoms every day.
Tuor
Give me liberty or give me death.
3
posted on
07/05/2002 5:22:35 PM PDT
by
Tuor
To: madfly; Ernest_at_the_Beach
fyi
To: Sabatier
Julian Simon's argument is that as the world's population increases, prosperity also increases because more brains are available to work the problem. And the increase in prosperity is greatest in nations that are economically free for the same reason. In Socialisms and dictatorships, only the elites are allowed access to the problem which is why they stagnate.
Each fall the Heritage Foundation publishes their list of the world's nations in order of most free to least free. On their list, there is no free nation that is not prosperous and no unfree nation that is not poor. Has nothing to do with resources or mean annual rainfall.
5
posted on
07/05/2002 6:25:11 PM PDT
by
edger
To: wooden nickel
Great article. Thanks for posting it.
6
posted on
07/05/2002 7:33:26 PM PDT
by
grundle
To: grundle; Libertarianize the GOP; Tuor; Sabatier; wooden nickel
The poor in America today in many ways live better than royalty did just a century ago . . . who in turn presumably lived better than the slaveholders of the antebellum South. That puts a whole different light on it, doesn't it?
In fact, by most standards, poor Americans today live better than average Americans did just 50 years ago. . . . and some of us remember that as being O.K. . . . The larger point is that journalism's short deadlines systematically filter out the small day-to-day improvements which accumulated to such remarkable economic progress over the course of the 20th century.
Journalism's bias is hiding in plain sight:
journalism is superficial because of its short deadlines, and--as illustrated above, (only) partly for that reason--journalism is negative towards the institutions and people upon which we-the-people depend.
That is sufficient, in-and-of itself, to explain why journalists are as anticonservative as Ann Coulter (Slander) says.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
bttt
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson