Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoLongerLurker
So if I were to smoke 1-2 Marlboro cigarettes a day, that wouldn't hurt me? And if it isn't harmful to me, then it certainly isn't harmful to the non-smokers around me. Therefore, I can smoke my Marlboros in public as long as no one else in the area is smoking? Try it, just one time.
70 posted on 07/10/2002 8:47:15 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Cigarettes contain all sorts of bad chemicals... put there by the tobacco companies.
A more accurate comparison would be a cigar or pipe tobacco.

Tobacco can even contain traces of uranium, if I'm not mistaken (It leeches it from the soil).

72 posted on 07/10/2002 8:53:47 AM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
So if I were to smoke 1-2 Marlboro cigarettes a day, that wouldn't hurt me? And if it isn't harmful to me, then it certainly isn't harmful to the non-smokers around me.

Both of the above statements are coreect.

There are essentially no detectable ill effects in people who smoke 1-2 cigarettes per day. It takes 15-20 pack-years of smoking to show a significant increase in incidence of cancer, emphysema or heart disease.

The effects of the secondary smoke of 1-2 cigarettes per day on others would be undetectable on any basis.

Except for your hysteria on the subject.

73 posted on 07/10/2002 8:57:33 AM PDT by NoLongerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson