But in some ways it is true - everyone is not continually being bombarded with news stories that pot causes everything from alzheimers to zits day in and day out the way you do about tobacco.
I think pot being illegal is ridiculous - what I and many others are trying to do is keep tobacco from going the way of pot. When we accomplish that, I will be more than happy to turn my energies to re-legalizing marijuana.
Well, I don't know what point the original poster is trying to get with this quote:
"Yes! Protect the WEED! It's ok to smoke WEED but heaven help us if we smoke tobacco!"
Like there are a ton of people out there who believe that all these people out here are saying it's ok to smoke weed, but not to smoke tobacco, suggesting that one is demonized over the other, when one can still buy tobacco at the store and still smoke in many restraunts (well, not in California) and bars and certinaly at home, while the other can have the person arrested if they buy or smoke it anywhere.
But in some ways it is true - everyone is not continually being bombarded with news stories that pot causes everything from alzheimers to zits day in and day out the way you do about tobacco.
Of course, primarily because it's legal and you need to attack a legal product to make it illegal. With pot, they already have the upper hand, and don't need to attack it much. When people suggest the possibility of legalizing weed, you will find the same articles about pot, although I'm not to quite sure about it causing zits : )
I think pot being illegal is ridiculous - what I and many others are trying to do is keep tobacco from going the way of pot. When we accomplish that, I will be more than happy to turn my energies to re-legalizing marijuana.
I appreciate that, and for my part, I have never voted for any type of tobacco legislation. I can tolerate tobacco smokers being upset at the idea of more taxes and restrictions alone, but I can't tolerate a person saying that pot smokers are favored anywhere more than tobacco smokers are, because it's certainly not true.