Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How many SEC Probes Issued Under Bush? Clinton
07/11/02 | HMV

Posted on 07/11/2002 2:31:17 PM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid

It seems that the SEC is probing everyone these days, why did we hear so little about SEC probes under Clinton? Is there data available suggesting that the Bush administration has been more agressive with the SEC than Clinton?


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: afv; americanfamilyvoices; andersen; arthuranderson; corruption; democrats; gloverparkgroup; joelockhart; lockhart; michaellux; occidental; occidentalpetroleum; oxy; oxychem; pftaw; schumer; sec; thedailyenron; worldcom

1 posted on 07/11/2002 2:31:17 PM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Interesting Keywords. While I don't have the answer to your question, I recommend you read this press release carefully, and then look at what's happened since.

Press Release New York's Senator
CHARLES E. SCHUMER


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 15, 2000


SCHUMER APPLAUDS NEW SEC RULE ON AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE

Schumer Worked With SEC and Accounting Firms To Negotiate Changes To Commission's Initial Proposed Rule To Make It Acceptable To Both Sides

US Senator Charles E. Schumer today applauded the approval of a new rule governing the independence of accounting firms by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Schumer played a critical role in bringing the SEC and accounting firms together to negotiate changes to the commission's initial rule proposal and craft a compromise that was acceptable to both sides.

"There was a broad stretch of middle ground here and it looks like they found it," said Schumer. "The SEC's rule change will promote investor confidence while ensuring that accounting firms are able to engage in appropriate lines of business."

The SEC initially proposed a rule that would have banned certain consulting practices for accounting firms who acted as auditor. The firms opposed this rule, arguing that there was no evidence that audit failures resulted from providing these services to audit clients. Schumer worked with both sides to find a middle ground between a full scale ban and simple disclosure.

2 posted on 07/11/2002 2:39:04 PM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jumpstartme
Great find! I think we can show that the demorats were much softer on big business as they would want us to believe.
3 posted on 07/11/2002 2:41:51 PM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Add this to your collection.
4 posted on 07/11/2002 2:44:41 PM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
I think the justice department put all thier eggs in the Microsoft/Big Tobacco basket.
5 posted on 07/11/2002 2:48:44 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
There was a good Frontline show on the collapse of Enron and how both democrats and republicans shared some of the accounting regulation problems.
6 posted on 07/11/2002 2:52:12 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
(don't know the answer to your question but love those Freeper names!)

Of course the Clinton Crime Gang didn't use the SEC to go after companies. They WANTED unchecked fraud, if that's what it took, to boost the stock market under Clinton. That way the deliterious effects of the massive tax increases of 1993 could be disguised (Clinton was determined to not be another Jimmuh Cahtuh).

Then, they just joined in the fun with Global Crossings - and who knows what other companies - with pure T fraud as we are seeing today.

By the way - speaking of financial disclosures.

Those who followed the Vince Foster murder know that Mr. Foster was charged with filing the Clinton financial disclosure forms which were supposed to be done by January, 1993. As of Foster's death, those forms had not yet been submitted. Why? Likely because all the Clinton drug money had not yet been hidden properly - OR - Mr. Foster was from the start reluctant to hide it as he was being instructed to do. He either told them - get some other stooge to do this, I won't (I'll leave Washington first) - OR he was so distressed over what happened at Waco that he expressed his revulsion too loudly ....we'll never know. What we do know is those financial papers that Clinton was supposed to file - WERE NOT FILED ON TIME!!!!

And, I am sure, when they were filed, they were not factual. But, again, we'll never know.

It's just that in the era of making companies and politicians be honest about their financial dealings - we must must must always always always go back to the Clinton Crime Gang and all its entourage and trapse before the watching world the truth of the financial shenanigans that were happening (the ones we know about) under Clinton.

They are the masters at financial fraud - and election fraud - and all other fraudulent procedures - because their very existance in the political world is based on LIES, DECEIT, and "Hillary's Moral Void"!!!! :-)

7 posted on 07/11/2002 2:58:36 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Where was the Clinton Adminstration, Justice Department, and SEC ... during the Dot.Com Boom .... when "Cooking the Books" was based upon .... a "Fantasy P & L and Balance Sheet" ... A hell of allot of ppl lost more money during that scam .... than what we are witnessing today ???
8 posted on 07/11/2002 3:08:00 PM PDT by GoldnGate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Don't forget, the DOJ attacked Microsoft.
9 posted on 07/11/2002 3:14:11 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
The main things Clinton probed were interns and enemies (via the IRS).
10 posted on 07/11/2002 3:19:37 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldnGate
Glad you asked. Algore's primary agent and supporter, Occidental Petroleum was fully engaged with Andersen auditing. In fact, they didn't fire them until after the Enron embarrassment. I wonder about those Occidental books.

snippit:

"Occidental Appoints KPMG Auditor

LOS ANGELES, March 22, 2002 -- Occidental Petroleum Corporation (NYSE:OXY) today announced that its Board of Directors has appointed KPMG as the company's independent auditor for 2002, replacing Arthur Andersen, LLP. Dr. Ray R. Irani, chairman and chief executive officer of Occidental, said, "The Andersen team that has served Occidental provided outstanding audit services and met our high standards during the course of a long and highly professional relationship."

Occidental Petroleum Corporation is one of the world's largest independent oil and natural gas exploration and production companies with operations concentrated in the United States, the Middle East and Latin America. Through its chemical subsidiary, OxyChem, Occidental also is a leading North American manufacturer and marketer of basic chemicals and certain performance chemicals. In 2001, Occidental reported net income of approximately $1.2 billion on net sales of $14 billion.

11 posted on 07/11/2002 3:21:37 PM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Also, former Clinton press hack, Joe Lochhart has done recent work for both WorldCom & Arthur Andersen in his new advertising agency, Glover Park.

It seems that Andersen had all kinds of inroads to the Gored Clinton administration. Here's that story:

Glover Park Group

The September 11 attacks mortally wounded network television ad sales. So it was no big surprise when NBC, a unit of General Electric, announced it was closing time for its 50-year-long ban on liquor ads at the end of last year. What is surprising, however, was which firm Diageo Plc, the United Kingdom-based spirits company that owns popular brands like Guinness, Smirnoff and Johnny Walker, went to in order to produce its prime-time commercial for NBC: Instead of going with a glitzy Madison Avenue agency, Diageo hired Washington insiders Joe Lockhart, Mike Feldman and Carter Eskew to get the drink-Smirnoff-but-drink-safely message across.

The three Democratic spinmeisters joined forces this summer and launched the DC-based Glover Park Group, a small communications-consulting firm that specializes in issue advertising. At the time, Lockhart, a Clinton White House press secretary; Feldman, who was a senior advisor to Vice President Al Gore; and Eskew, chief strategist for Gore's presidential campaign, were all taking some time off. "We all decided it was time to get serious," says Lockhart, who quit his job as press secretary to flack for Oracle's Larry Ellison - but returned to DC in May 2001 because he said he found bisexual life to be too grueling. (Couldn't possibly have had anything to do with Larry Ellison being too grueling, we're sure.)

The nascent firm has already created ads for Bob Dole and Bill Clinton's philanthropic collaboration; eBizJets, a Boston, MA-based airline; and various do-gooder groups. But Diageo's name is conspicuously absent on the "Who We've Worked With" section of the Glover Park Group's website.

Asked about the controversial prime-time liquor campaign, Lockhart says, "We are referring all calls about that to Guinness…. We are not discussing that campaign." Lockhart adds that there are at least three new deals that his firm is working on but is similarly unable to talk about them. "Clients are funny that way," he says.

FYI, some other names on Lockhart's client list include WorldCom & Andersen.

12 posted on 07/11/2002 3:31:06 PM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Not quite the answer to your question, but some interesting info nevertheless here.
13 posted on 07/11/2002 3:31:44 PM PDT by AmusedBystander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Clinton ignored many crimes. President Bush aggressively prosecutes lawbreakers.
14 posted on 07/11/2002 3:33:40 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Great subject........and the answer is.....?????
15 posted on 07/11/2002 3:34:27 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hmmm, the link in post 12 worked yesterday. Now it doesn't. Funny thing about the Internet, one can't hide a previously published web page.

Here it is. So sorry, Joe.

16 posted on 07/11/2002 3:34:54 PM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jumpstartme; Hillary'sMoralVoid
......Here it is. So sorry, Joe........

You did great!! Unfortunately, "the work itself" isn't available now. But.....doesn't American Family Voices ring a bell? The work for that group is the new derragatory commercials about Bush/Cheney. Lockhart must be proud of his work since he's ducking & hiding.

Look for American Family Voices on Yahoo and you get "The Daily Enron". Link is:

http://www.thedailyenron.com/

Clinton slime goes a long way. I knew he was telling us something with that Esquire Magazine cover after the election. I'm afraid we have much more to learn about his "legacy".
17 posted on 07/11/2002 8:58:25 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: windchime
Amrican Family Voices is a sham org. set up by Michael Lux to launder money for the DNC. Here's a good link for ya!
18 posted on 07/11/2002 9:29:39 PM PDT by jumpstartme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
Bump
19 posted on 07/12/2002 12:06:51 AM PDT by Kay Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jumpstartme
Thank you!
20 posted on 07/12/2002 6:52:47 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson