Posted on 08/16/2002 7:33:52 AM PDT by Askel5
LET US PREY I am not a Roman Catholic, but in the historic enclave were I was raised, pretty much the only people we knew of were Catholics and Jews. Needless to say, everyone was a Democrat and believed that Franklin Roosevelt had been sent there by God, or maybe that he was God Himself. Once in a while, an inmate who got out would return with preposterous tales of other people called "Protestants" and "Republicans." Of course, no one paid any attention. After all, how dumb can you get? So, I set these observations forth as an outsider, in the belief that the horror in progress inside the Roman Catholic Church today is supremely important to all of us, Catholic or otherwise, because of what it means to other churches and to the country. What is happening is not just the haphazard eruption of predatory sodomites with their collars on backwards; rather, as you will see, the metastasizing horror appears to be well orchestrated. Lets go back to the beginning, which many scholars say is May 1, 1776. On that date, Adam Weishaupt, a professor of canon law at Ingolstadt University, in what is now Germany, founded the Society of Illuminati. The Illuminists worked in secret, using noms de guerre, and recruited the sons of the wealthiest, best-born, most powerful families into their conspiracy. The goal of the Illuminists was to impose a dictatorship that would enslave the entire world, in the course of which all religion would be destroyed. Eventually, they were raided by the forces of the Elector of Bavaria, who seized some of their paperwork, which found its way into the work of Scottish Professor John Robison, who wrote Proofs of a Conspiracy (1798), which will tell you from their own mouths how the Illuminists recruited. You could also consult the four-volume Memoirs of the History of Jacobinism, by the Abbé Barruel, which, if memory serves, has recently been reissued in a new translation. The Electors fine work did not completely squelch the conspirators, who simply fled Bavaria and went to Paris, where they infiltrated the Grand Orient Lodges of the Masonic Order, which they used to foment the French Revolution in 1789. In Paris, they began to implement their scheme to destroy all religion, and since the Roman Catholic Church at the time still had immense political, as well as ecclesiastical power, the conspirators did what they could to wreck it. The Illuminati later metastasized into the Communist movement, which in 1848 hired an unknown degenerate named Karl Marx to write a manifesto that would memorialize the revolution they were planning for that year. Now, lets move along to the Twentieth Century. Where did the latest extrusion of the sodomite movement originate? According to expert Stuart Timmons, in The Trouble With Harry Hay, Founder of the Modern Gay Movement (Boston, Alyson, 1990), modern sodomy derives from an outfit called the Mattachine Society, all of whose founders, just after World War II, were Marxists. Harry Hay himself, for instance, the preeminent founder, had been a Party member. Indeed, says Timmons, in structuring the new Communist homosexual group, Harry Hay "followed the Masonic model." (p. 152). Indeed, "Harry had found his model, the Freemasons of the eighteenth century, in his music research. The Masons had been illegal and underground at that time . . . ." (italics added) Now, browse with me through another manifesto entitled After the Ball, How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s (New York, Doubleday, 1989), by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen. The authors teach that sodomites should "inundate" straights (normal men and women) "in a continuous flood of gay-related advertising . . . ." (p. 149). The advertising will perpetrate something called "jamming," which they explain as follows: ". . . Thus propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths and a**holes-people who say not only faggot but nigger, kike, and other shameful epithets-who are not Christian. . . ." (p. 151) The goal is something they call "conversion," which is worse than old-fashioned subversion. " . . . Yet, ironically, by Conversion we actually mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life . . . . We mean conversion of the average Americans emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. . . ." (p. 153) (italics added) On the next page, they admit that those ads will be lies. ". . . But it makes no difference that the ads are lies; not to us, because were using them to ethically good effect . . . ." In other words, the end justifies the means, a hallowed commandment to all Marxists. The important thing, they say, is to keep talking, talking, talking, because the more they talk about sodomy, the more "tiresome" and normal it will seem. Finally, Kirk and Madsen say this: "[A]ctivists have concentrated their efforts on politics, meaning efforts to secure gay rights by conspiring with liberal elites within the legal and legislative systems." (Pp. 170-71) Remember, the word "conspiring" is theirs, not mine. Indeed: ". . . The goal here has been to forge a little entente or conspiracy with the power elite, to jump ahead of public sentiment or ignore it altogether." They speak of the successful use of "many executive orders (which side-step the democratic process) . . . ." (italics added) Now ask yourself, is all this a mere fantasy, or has it been happening? The point is that the present sodomite explosion is by no means haphazard; you are being subjected to a brilliantly orchestrated plan, the first gambit in which was the founding of the Mattachine Society by Reds. And remember that all of this comes from the connivers themselves, what our friends the lawyers call an "admission against interest." Finally, remember that according to the holiest writ of the sodomite movement, people are born homosexual. No choice is involved. Sodomites can no more blamed for sodomy than "straights" can be blamed for heterosexuality. But Kirk and Madsen say as follows on page 184 in a parenthesis: ". . . (We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay-even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence.) To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled moral choice and sin and give the religious Intransigents a stick to beat us with. . . ." In other words, sodomites are made. The idea that people are "born gay" is another conspiratorial lie; is nothing but another media gambit designed to keep the lid tightly on that sinful "can of worms." How else could rescue groups be salvaging so many from the sodomite lifestyle and restoring them to normal life? The sodomite onslaught in the media, in the schools and everywhere else has been designed to convince us that sodomy is as normal as apple pie and baseball. Some guys like blondes. Some guys like brunettes. And, according to the lie, some guys like guys. But the horror in the Church proves the point that sodomites are made, not born; that they must recruit because they cant give birth-and that sodomy by its nature includes preying upon children. Years ago, when subversion was starting to show up in many Protestant denominations, observers who werent Catholic would nevertheless applaud the fact that there were no signs of it in the Catholic Church; they said that at least the Catholics still upheld the basic principles of Christianity. What happened? My speculation is that subversion-and now perversion-just took longer to show up in the Catholic Church. Because Protestantism is what it is, anyone can open a storefront church. Because the Catholic Church is hierarchical, however, it no doubt took many years for the termites to work their way high enough in the hierarchy so that they could safely "come out." All right, we now have the context we need to look at what is happening in the Roman Catholic Church. Next week, well see what the sodomite conspiracy is doing in the seminaries; well see the real reason there is a "shortage" of priests. That should give you everything you need to answer the question of whether what is happening is just routine perversion, or whether it is part of an attempt to destroy the Church. Be with your Intrepid Correspondent then.
"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."
Alan Stang can be reached at: stangfeedback@hotmail.com Published in the August 23, 2002 issue of Ether Zone. Copyright © 1997 - 2002 Ether Zone. We invite your comments on this article in our forum! |
Cannot recommend it highly enough. Stang either has read it or should read it. Jones did his homework.
Here's a taste: Internet in Gaza: Sexual Liberation as Political Control
Are you kidding? The Catholic Church is the IDEAL point of infiltration. It's not only the heart of Christendom (i.e., "the West" or "Europe") yet standing it's a GLOBAL operation.
If you look at the way the IAF and Interfaith thugs from Chicago twined their way along the network of dioceses and parishes (particularly in the southwest) ... "organizing" parishes, cell group by cell group of parishioners ... you have a good idea of how effective is an operation that seeks to destroy the Church from within or by faith-based partnership.
For the non-sexual bent ... more articles on the naked co-opting of the Church, politicization of the Gospel, precursor to the State's interest in "faith-based partnerships" and Campaign for Human Development "United Way" model for revolution from the top down are found in these articles:
"You Gotta Have Faith" (Atheist David Whore-owitz argues in favor of the philosophical inheritance of our Christian founding fathers.)
""Let´s look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90´s (1989).
In Chapter Six, they outline ten categories of misbehavior, drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the gay lifestyle, not gay sexuality mind you, is the pits. They want gays to improve their image by addressing what is wrong with a lot of gays. (276)
What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven´t caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.
The authors say a surprisingly high percentage of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one´s own gayness and its implications.
They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to If it feels good, I´ll do it! If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend´s lover, he´ll do it, justifying it as an act of sexual freedom and the friend be damned.
They say gays suffer from a narcissistic personality disorder and they give this clinical description: pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation.
As an example of this narcissism, the authors say a very sizable proportion of gay men who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.
They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such forbidden aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.
They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.
Many gays are single minded sexual predators fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are the real queerbashers. Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.
Relationships between gay men don´t usually last very long. They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The cheating ratio of married´ gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.
Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.
The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.
With two glaring exceptions, of course:
Masonic as well as Marxist alert!
A giant conspiracy involving Sodomites, Masons, and Illuminati. No Bilderbergs or lizard people? Surely they must be involved also!
Now ask yourself, is all this a mere fantasy, or has it been happening?
Hmmmmm, that's a tough one.
There it is again, that congenitally degenerate argument.
It's a meaningless argument. People are born with spina bifida. My mom was born an alcoholic according to some. People are born with hot tempers and fast fists. And everyone is born hopelessly ignorant.
Human beings overcome what we are born, we don't surrender to it.
Well, maybe I should make that "conservatives" rather than "human beings." Liberals seem to have surrendered to hopeless ignorance.
Shalom.
It's true. My Catholic Church is now a sodomite, queerized Church where my sons are not necessarily safe in the company of a Catholic priests, and where I cannot rely on any priest to teach or model authentic Catholicism. For those who think rampant homosexuality is harmless, the horrendously injured souls and bodies of thousands of teenage boys say otherwise.
Sorry to hear it. Not everyone has the good fortune to be in a parish like St. Patrick's.
I'll type up yesterday's sermon on the Feast of the Assumption to as to share with you the authentic, traditional and always orthodox teaching of our Pastor.
It's a Boy!
The point being that sexual identity is intimately bound up with the understanding of what it means to be human -- which itself means nothing at all only unless it's grounded in sound theology. The whole point of tampering with Man is to tamper with our understanding of God, whose image and likeness we are.
Although "gay liberation" may be driven in part by the desire to manipulate through appeal to appetite, and by the determination of powerful figures to retain power by pandering to those appetites (interesting etymology, "pander"), this can't be the whole story for anyone who derives his understanding of humanity from his understanding of God. Whether in the priesthood or not, homosexuality is satanic because by distorting man's understanding of what he is, man's understanding of, and relationship with, God is corrupted and subverted.
I think you were closer the first time. I have yet to have proven to me that liberals are really human beings. After all, would a human promote murdering it's children before they are born for convenience sake? Would a human support forcing people to remain as slaves of the state rather than to be free? Would a human support sexual degeneracy rather than stable families? I don't think so.
The liberals have surrendered their humanity at the altar of sexual degeneracy and government dependancy
God Save America (Please)
I have yet to have proven to me that liberals are really human beings.
So you're saying that liberals are some Darwinian precursor to us? Maybe Homo-Ignoramus?
Interesting theory.
Shalom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.