Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amid court ban, Ezra says use relatives as 'human shields'
Ha'aretz ^ | 8.19.2002 | By Moshe Reinfeld, Ha'aretz Correspondent, and Ha'aretz Service

Posted on 08/19/2002 9:31:50 AM PDT by eshu

w w w . h a a r e t z d a i l y . c o m

Amid court ban, Ezra says use relatives as 'human shields'

Amid a High Court restraining order against the IDF's use of neighbors of suspected terrorists as "human shields" to lure the suspects out of their hide-outs, Likud Deputy Public Security Minister Gideon Ezra said Monday that the army should instead use family members for the purpose.

Ezra, a former senior Shin Bet official, was responsing to a Sunday High Court ruling that granted a coalition of human rights groups a restraining order against the IDF's use of the "neighbor practice." The practice is used by soldiers who order the neighbor of a wanted Palestinian suspect to go to the suspect's house to ask him to give himself up, thus exposing the neighbor, not soldiers, to the risk the wanted man might open fire.

The one-week restraining order prevents the army from using the practice until the High Court rules on a previous petition, which asked the court to ban the use of Palestinian civilians as "human shields."

"For the benefit of the Arabs and of our soldiers, this initial confrontation, this meeting between the soldiers and the candidate for arrest should go as smoothly as possible," Ezra told Army Radio. "The best, for this purpose, is to use a member of the family."

The rights groups claim, via attorney Marwan Dalal, that on August 14, Ahmed Abu Mohsan, 19, was killed after IDF soldiers forced him to walk ahead of them and knock on the door of his neighbor in the West Bank village of Tubas, during an Israeli operation in the village.

In response to the petition, which was filed three months ago, the IDF told the court, via the attorney general, that it would issue an order banning the use of human shields. That said, the IDF claims that the 'neighbor practice' is not the same as using human shields. According to IDF sources, each field commander has the discretion whether to use the practice or not.

In his petition for a temporary restraining order, Dalal insisted that there is no difference between human shields and the 'neighbor practice.' According to Dalal, the practice is forced in the 'collaborator.' This is an infringement of the Geneva Convention, which grants a civilian living in occupied territory freedom from coercion. Dalal stressed that the IDF is not entitled to force a civilian to carry out military missions that may endanger his or her life.

The petition also includes several quotes from Ha'aretz, which show that several IDF field commanders believe that the 'neighbor practice' is an efficient operative tactic. According to attorney Dalal, this proves that, in the eyes of these IDF commanders, the value of a Palestinian life is virtually nothing, and that the judgment of these commanders' cannot, therefore, be trusted.
By Moshe Reinfeld, Ha'aretz Correspondent, and Ha'aretz Service


/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=198884
close window


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: israelpalestine

1 posted on 08/19/2002 9:31:50 AM PDT by eshu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eshu; monkeyshine; ipaq2000; Lent; veronica; Sabramerican; beowolf; Nachum; BenF; angelo; ...
A Palestinian kills a Palestinian and Jews blame Jews. CRAZY!!
2 posted on 08/20/2002 7:53:52 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
 

 

 

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=198222

 

Officers defend 'human shield' practice
By Jonathan Lis and Baruch Kra

Senior Israel Defense Forces officers yesterday defended the army's use of Palestinians to call wanted men out of hideouts or to tour homes suspected of containing booby traps, on the grounds that the method "saves lives, on our side and their side." According to IDF sources, the method was used in the capture of Marwan Barghouti, the Fatah leader now on trial on various counts of terrorism.

The issue has shot to the top of the public agenda with Wednesday's death of Nidal Muhsein, a 19-year-old from the village of Tubas, who was sent by the IDF to knock on the door of his neighbor's house where the IDF suspected a wanted man, Nasser Jerar, was hiding. After he knocked, and the door opened, the youth - who had been put in an army flak jacket for the purpose - was cut down by shots fired from inside the house.

IDF and police sources refused yesterday to give an official count of the extent to which the method, known as "neighbor practice," is used, but all confirmed it is very extensive. One senior police officer said that it has been used "hundreds of times to reach wanted men and to comb houses for fear of booby traps. In recent months it has been used very often during the fighting."

The officer's account contradicts an army promise given by the state to the High Court of Justice in early May - as a result of petitions by several human rights groups - that the army would cease using civilians "in homes, streets, or wherever the IDF is operating" as "living shields" for IDF troops. The petitioners suspended their case to the court after that promise, and the court did not issue a verdict on the matter at the time. As a result of the Muhsein incident, the petitions are expected to be revived.

The "neighbor practice" is mostly used when trying to get a wanted man out of a house. Under such circumstances the army uses what it refers to as "a pressure cooker." First the troops surround the house, using megaphones to call out the wanted man. Then one of the neighbors is sent to call on the suspect to come out. At that point, if they don't respond, the neighbor is pulled back and troops open fire with anti-tank missiles and light weapons at the house. If that doesn't work, a bulldozer is brought in to knock down the house on top of the suspects inside.

Despite the public criticism, and the ostensible army order presumably handed down after the court hearing in May, the practice is widely used in the army, in an attempt to save lives - both Israeli and Palestinian, said some sources, while others just said Israeli.

"The fact that nobody was killed until the day before yesterday," said one officer, "is proof of how effective it is to send a neighbor to the door rather than just opening fire or risking life." In most cases, said the officer, "the suspect comes out on his own, without turning the arrest into a firefight and without endangering the soldiers, police or neighbors."

In other cases, soldiers use Palestinians to comb houses being searched for weapons to make sure nothing is booby-trapped. The human rights group B'Tselem has collected testimony about this practice, and in May, as part of its petition to the court, the group presented testimony given by reserve officers who witnessed the practice.

One said that "it is very organized. First the house is surrounded, and then we knock on the door and announce it's the army. The men are asked to lift their shirts (lest they are wearing weapons or explosive belts) and the women and children are put in a separate room. Then the men are taken on a search of the house. We point at things and ask them to touch them. The rationale is the fear of booby traps. In effect, it makes the search much easier, and it doesn't end up with everything turned upside down in the house."

Another officer told B'Tselem that "before the search we go to a neighbor, take him out of his house and tell him to call the people we want out of the next door house. If it works, it works, and if not we blow up the door or knock it down with a hammer. The neighbor goes in first. If they're planning something, he gets it. The orders say to send him upstairs first, and to take everyone out ... we take their ID cards, and then make the neighbor go through the house. We find who we were looking for and arrest them ... The neighbor does not have the option to refuse to do it. He shouts, knocks on the door and says the army's here. If nobody answers, he comes back and we go to work."

Senior officers, defending the practice yesterday - though admitting it is controversial inside the army - said that Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti was arrested using the method. "We sent one of his neighbors to knock on the door and tell him that the army was waiting outside," said a senior officer. "Because of the neighbor, Barghouti and his men didn't open fire at the neighbor and the soldiers, and his arrest was made without any resistance."

As for the orders issued by the army in May in the wake of the court hearing, a senior officer said that the IDF interpreted the orders to mean that the practice is forbidden "if the neighbor is put at risk." Another officer said that "this is a military method, an efficient and effective method, it's used by the police and by the army."

Last night, former justice minister Yossi Beilin called the practice "immoral and un-Jewish." He charged that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer "are responsible for the worst moral deterioration in the history of Israel. Not only is this practice illegal, not Jewish, and immoral, Israel is paying an enormous price for it. This government is teaching the army the worst practices, and is turning the concept of `purity of arms' into slander."


3 posted on 08/20/2002 7:58:05 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
What's the difference between Ha'aretz and Al Jazeera?

(this is not a joke, but if you have a good punch line let's hear it)

4 posted on 08/20/2002 7:59:16 AM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
A Palestinian kills a Palestinian and Jews blame Jews. CRAZY!!

Jews should refrain from proselytising each other about their own ideologies, and leftist Jews first.

5 posted on 08/20/2002 8:10:29 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The English used to do this as SOP. They would gather the elders of a village and make them walk ahead of the British convoys or patrols when passing through Arab villages.
6 posted on 08/20/2002 8:34:10 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
It's a legitimate tactic as far as I'm concerned. This way the IDF boys don't get shot and killed. Instead a Palestinian *maybe* gets killed by a Palestinian which if that's how mad dog crazy they are, it's their own problem.

Why should one IDF soldier be endangered, even lose his life, when the IDF tries to root out Islamic terrorists? The Israeli left should be ashamed for criticizing this ploy.

7 posted on 08/20/2002 8:40:56 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
And should I add that the Oslo process proselytisers of the left are happily using Israeli lives as shields to tame terrorists. Nice to know some people hope to pave their glory personal crusades over other people's lives.
8 posted on 08/20/2002 8:48:13 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Don't play your stereo too loudly, neighbor, or I might enjoy having you used as a human shield.
9 posted on 08/20/2002 11:46:18 PM PDT by hinina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson