Skip to comments.
CIA Corrupts a Hero - Scott Ritter flip/flop: FLASHBACK 9.19.01
NewsMax ^
| Monday, Nov. 19, 2001
| John LeBoutillier
Posted on 08/23/2002 1:57:39 PM PDT by rface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Ashland, Missouri - (please delete if duplicate)
1
posted on
08/23/2002 1:57:39 PM PDT
by
rface
To: rface
I'm open to anyone's convincing argument that Ritter is other than either a liar or an idiot.
2
posted on
08/23/2002 2:03:52 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: rface
Bump
To: rface
"What happened? How could such a transformation occur? "Money.
4
posted on
08/23/2002 2:08:35 PM PDT
by
ez2muz
To: aristeides; thinden; Mitchell; The Great Satan
This makes sense.
To: rface
Scott Ritter was a disgrace in the American uniforum and now a disgrace to America.I honestly believe he's being paid by Saddam to defend him on all the talk shows.
To: onedoug
I agree wholeheartedly that something is mega-fishy about Scott Ritter's otherwise inexplicable 180. But the rationale put forth here, doesn't make much sense to me.
7
posted on
08/23/2002 2:22:23 PM PDT
by
berned
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: rface
He's a traitor and a UN lackey.
9
posted on
08/23/2002 2:32:52 PM PDT
by
bok
To: berned
much of this doesn't make sense to me either - but the biggest problem is this flip/flop...this is such an obvious issue.
10
posted on
08/23/2002 2:33:42 PM PDT
by
rface
To: rface; Travis McGee
For this scenario to be true, Scott Ritter would have to be one of the best actors in the history of acting. The man has teamed up with radical peaceniks. His 180 could more easily be explained by alien abduction than by conscious CIA manipulation.
In the press conference he gave (aired on C-SPAN 5 times), sponsored by Rep Kucinich, he kept referencing the idea that the inspectors could have done their job if they hadn't been manipulated into acting as spies against Saddam. He appeared quite disturbed by this idea. I was wondering if he had been brainwashed somewhere.
11
posted on
08/23/2002 2:38:53 PM PDT
by
maica
To: onedoug
I'm open to anyone's convincing argument that Ritter is other than either a liar or an idiot.
Easily done onedoug.
Because he is BOTH a liar AND an idiot. And probably a few other thngs I can't mention here.
12
posted on
08/23/2002 2:39:25 PM PDT
by
3k9pm
To: rface
MONEY CHANGES EVERYTHING!
13
posted on
08/23/2002 2:41:09 PM PDT
by
jaz.357
To: rface; maica
To my mind, the only things that could truly cause a man to trash his own reputation, his honor, and his word as a man, as Scott Ritter has done, are:
1) an enormous sum of money (unlikely) or 2) fear for his own life or the lives of his family.
We have seen how the "power elite" seem to be desperate to keep Saddam propped up (including such "republican" NWO-types as Scowcroft and Eagleburger -- presumably GHWB also). if this perception is really true, it's not hard to imagine the death threats on Ritter to shut up, or better yet, play ball with the Powers that be.
I wonder if Saddam plays some important role in the coming New Order. (The only role I can see is maybe they are hoping he nukes Israel, the one country the NWO will never corrupt or win over.) Just MHO.
14
posted on
08/23/2002 2:47:59 PM PDT
by
berned
To: Fred Mertz
I can certainly believe Scott Ritter was and is a CIA asset. I don't understand, however, why the CIA would oppose an attack on Iraq.
To: onedoug
"I'm open to anyone's convincing argument that Ritter is other than either a liar or an idiot"
I suspect he has been threatened or someone close to him has been. He seems to be trying very hard to not incur the wrath of Sadam. Sad, but thats the most logical explaination of his flip/flop that I can think of.
16
posted on
08/23/2002 4:22:11 PM PDT
by
lstanle
To: lstanle
So, he's a liar.
17
posted on
08/23/2002 4:24:40 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
I watched him on the television line ups during the Clinton fiasco and I have seen his interviews recently which brings me to the conclusion that he is both.
18
posted on
08/23/2002 4:59:25 PM PDT
by
hope
To: INSENSITIVE GUY
I honestly believe he's being paid by Saddam Or threatened, perhaps?
To: rface
Next time you see Ritter on TV< watch his nostrils, they go crazy when he starts off on these tangents...I read somewhere that that's an indication of lying...
20
posted on
08/23/2002 5:16:06 PM PDT
by
Benrand
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson