[Bryan]

Regarding the attacks against Drs. Cameron and Reisman, it is my impression that the Gay Left, like the many other splinter factions bound together on the Left by hatred for all things traditional and Judeo-Christian, have certain tactics that they fall back upon when the fact aren't in their favor -- which is pretty much all the time.

It's as though the Left has an official playbook, like the playbook that football coaches hand out to their players on the first day of practice. And it appears that Page One of the Official Left-Wing Playbook says: "Distort something that your conservative opponent said into something that is either stupid or evil, and shove it back into his face."

Page Two of the Official Left-Wing Playbook says: "It doesn't matter that you've never seen your conservative debate opponent face to face, and that you actually live hundreds, or even thousands of miles away from him. It doesn't matter that you know absolutely nothing about him aside from the fact that he doesn't agree with you. And it doesn't matter that your entire training in psychiatry consists of one semester of Psych 101, in which you squeaked by with a 'C.' You are qualified to psychoanalyze him, and to return a diagnosis of some really dangerous mental illness." Hence the construction of the word "homophobia."

The tactics of the pro-homosexual side of this debate are characterized by ridicule, contempt, schoolyard taunts and, overall, doing to Dr. Reisman and Cameron what is suggested on Page Three of the Official Left-Wing Playbook: "If the facts are completely against you, it's better to attack the messenger rather than attempting t refute the message."

[yendu bwam]

The tactics of the pro-homosexual side of this debate are characterized by ridicule, contempt, schoolyard taunts and, overall, doing to Dr. Reisman and Cameron what is suggested on Page Three of the Official Left-Wing Playbook: "If the facts are completely against you, it's better to attack the messenger rather than attempting t refute the message."

Having gone through trial by fire with gay activists on the Boy Scout homosexual scoutmaster question, and having really been stung by the (untrue) epithets hurled at me, I find that I've survived the epithet disease, and that I'm now immune. A LOT of people are just learning to ignore the hate and vitriol from homosexual activists. The tactic, while useful on their part for some time, is rapidly losing its effectiveness.

[EdReform]

THE 'GAY SPIN ZONE'

[JoshGray]

So, are you borrowing a page from that playbook? Because I didn't attack you, Reisman, or Cameron -- I discredited your post and the methodology common to the three of you.

Do you care to defend your post and such methodology, or do you wish to continue attacking me personally?

[CalConservative]

Actually, there is an official playbook for the homosexual agenda. it is a book called After the Ball: How America will conquer its fear & hatred of Gays in the 90’s published in 1989 by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen. It lays out the entire gameplan for the homosexual movement.

As for the general playbook for the rest of the left, try the Humanist Manifesto I & I and the Humanist Manifesto 2000. You will be surprised at how well the gameplan is being played out.