Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Near-Earth objects pose threat, general says
spaceref.com ^ | 8 SEP 02 | Press Release

Posted on 09/08/2002 9:21:23 PM PDT by RightWhale

Air Force Space Command News Service

Near-Earth objects pose threat, general says

WASHINGTON -- This summer, much of the world watched as India and Pakistan faced-off over the disputed Kashmir region, worried that the showdown could escalate into a nuclear war.

Coincidentally, U.S. early warning satellites detected an explosion in the Earth's atmosphere June 6, at the height of the tension, with an energy release estimated to be 12 kilotons.

Fortunately the detonation, equivalent to the blast that destroyed Hiroshima, occurred over the Mediterranean Sea. However, if it had occurred at the same latitude a few hours earlier, the result on human affairs might have been much worse, said Brig. Gen. Simon P. Worden, U.S. Space Command's deputy director for operations at Peterson Air Force Base, Colo.

Had the bright flash, accompanied by a damaging shock wave, occurred over India or Pakistan, the resulting panic could have sparked a nuclear war, Worden recently told members of the congressionally mandated Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry in testimony here.

Although U.S. officials quickly determined that a meteor caused the explosion, neither India nor Pakistan have the sophisticated sensors that can determine the difference between a natural near-Earth object impact and a nuclear detonation, Worden said in written testimony.

This is one of many threats posed by NEOs, especially as more and more nations acquire nuclear weapons, said Worden, who appeared before the commission as a scientist who has studied NEOs and as a space expert familiar with the technologies that can be used to address the NEO threat.

In recent years, the Department of Defense has been working to provide data about asteroid strikes to nations potentially under missile attack and to the scientific community; however, it takes several weeks for the data to be released since much of it is gathered from classified systems.

Worden suggested that a NEO warning center be established that can assess and release this data as soon as possible to all interested parties while ensuring sensitive data is safeguarded.

He recommended to the commission that a natural impact warning clearinghouse could be formed by adding no more than 10 people to current U.S. Space Command early warning centers.

This organization would catalog and provide credible warning information on future NEO impact problems, as well as rapidly provide information on the nature of an impact.

In order for this clearinghouse to provide accurate information, NEOs must first be detected, cataloged and their orbits defined.

Current ground-based systems are already cataloging large kilometer-sized objects but have a difficult time finding smaller NEOs. Most sail by the earth unnoticed until they have passed, he said.

"Just about everyone knows of the 'dinosaur killer' asteroids," Worden said. "These are objects, a few kilometers across, that strike on time scales of tens of millions of years. While the prospect of such strikes grabs people's attention and makes great catastrophe movies, too much focus on these events has been counterproductive. We need to focus our energies on the smaller, more immediate threats."

The smaller strikes, while not exactly commonplace, have occurred on several occasions over the past century, with potentially devastating results, he said.

"An object probably less than 100 meters in diameter struck Tunguska in Siberia in 1908, releasing the energy equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear blast," Worden said. "In 1996, our satellite sensors detected a burst over Greenland equal to a 100-kiloton yield. Had any of these struck over a populated area, perhaps hundreds of thousands might have perished."

An even worse catastrophe would be an ocean impact near a heavily populated shore by one of these Tunguska-sized objects.

"The resulting tidal wave could inundate shorelines for hundreds of miles and potentially kill millions," Worden explained.

"There are hundreds of thousands of objects this size that come near the Earth," he said. "We know the orbits of just a few. New space-surveillance systems capable of scanning the entire sky every few days are needed. They could enable us to completely catalog and warn of objects (less than 100 meters in diameter)."

According to Worden, this does not mean other groups, in particular the international scientific community, should not continue their independent efforts. But the United States is likely, for the foreseeable future, to have most of the required sensors to do this job. He added that DOD has the discipline and continuity to ensure consistent, long-term focus.

"I believe various aspects related to NEO impacts, including the possibility that an impact would be misidentified as a nuclear attack, are critical national and international security issues," he said. "The focus of NEO mitigation efforts should shift to smaller objects. The near-term threats are much more likely to come from these 'small' objects, and we might be able to divert such objects without (resorting) to nuclear devices."

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 established the Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry. The commission was formed to study the future of the U.S. aerospace industry in the global economy, particularly in relationship to national security, and provide recommendations to the president and Congress.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 99balonen; asteroid; kiloton
Is it at all likely that a bolide would be mistaken for a nuke blast?
1 posted on 09/08/2002 9:21:23 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
NEOs are the real environmental threat. It's one of the reasons why we need a missile defense shield.
2 posted on 09/08/2002 9:29:57 PM PDT by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Although U.S. officials quickly determined that a meteor caused the explosion, neither India nor Pakistan have the sophisticated sensors that can determine the difference between a natural near-Earth object impact and a nuclear detonation, Worden said in written testimony.

Would they even detect it in the first place?

3 posted on 09/08/2002 9:30:11 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Gee, maybe earth is having it's weather changed by an object coming our way. Where all going to die. Agggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

Like what could we do about such things anyway?
4 posted on 09/08/2002 9:34:27 PM PDT by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maro
a missle shield could not stop a neo.
5 posted on 09/08/2002 9:42:47 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
a missle shield could not stop a neo.

That's true.

6 posted on 09/08/2002 9:45:34 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

“Oh, that stuff is old hat. The General says now Near-Earth objects pose threat. Here, fill out this form and put on your helmet. The “Big One” could be along at any time now.”

7 posted on 09/08/2002 9:52:15 PM PDT by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Why not?
8 posted on 09/08/2002 10:20:36 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Would they even detect it in the first place?

The huge white flash and building crushing shock wave might make them suspect something was amiss.

9 posted on 09/08/2002 10:23:04 PM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
NORAD once detected a Soviet missle attack (back during the 1950s). Of course the reported range of 240,000 miles did alleviate concerns.
10 posted on 09/08/2002 10:31:32 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
If I remember correctly from Clancy's Sum of All Fears novel, a similar blast detection system was in play and caused confusion after the nuke in the USA was detonated. I can't remember all the details- it's been years since I read the book- but I do recall it malfunctioned (the system) because of the amplifying effects of the parking lot's asphalt and this mistake actually heightened the confusion of the situation. So perhaps it's plausible... FWIW
11 posted on 09/08/2002 10:34:18 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Should read: H-Bomb

Tornado

Bill Clinton



Audience: Don't sign that paper!!!!
12 posted on 09/08/2002 10:41:59 PM PDT by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
range of 240,000 miles did alleviate

Well that does put it inside the orbit of the moon. Probably not a missile attack but still to close for comfort.

13 posted on 09/08/2002 10:43:40 PM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Its not certain the Tunguska event was a bolide; most think it was a comet. But the blast was eerily similar to a nuke air explosion, the kind needed for maximum EMP effect. How would they tell the difference at first?
14 posted on 09/08/2002 11:02:44 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capitan_refugio; maro
A missle shield needs to break a 2,000 pound warhead (or lighter) into fragments. A hundred foot wide neo (which is small) weighs about 11 million pounds. As an example, a compact car is mostly air and still weighs over 2,000 pounds. You can put a lot of compact cars in a 100 foot wide sphere. Stopping an object that weighs in the millions of pounds is harder than stopping an object that weighs only a few thousand pounds.
15 posted on 09/08/2002 11:47:17 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
To continue in this vein...

The other principal approach to incoming ICBM neutralization is with lasers or particle beams. This approach depends on the object being fragile; i.e., a round flimsy tube, with sensitive electronics/mechanics. Clearly useless against an NEO.

16 posted on 09/09/2002 2:13:49 AM PDT by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Not to mention....

You also have a detection problem. Ballistic missiles, as the name implies, follow ballistic, suborbital paths, all of which originate in some country and enter the atmosphere at less than orbital velocity (~7 km/sec). NEOs approach the Earth at much higher velocities (typically, ~ 20 km/sec) and come from any direction. Once detected, it's usually too late to stop them. And if you launched a nuke to intercept them, you would just create a shower of high velocity stones (although if broken up sufficiently, most would burn up in the atmosphere, rather than hit the Earth.)

The best solution is early detection and then, intercept them in deep space and deflect them by slightly changing their velocity. A low, constant thrust rocket (like an ion engine) is the best scenario.

17 posted on 09/09/2002 2:22:17 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Is it at all likely that a bolide would be mistaken for a nuke blast?

By the US or the old USSR, probably not; they'd developed reasonably good C&C. By a two-bit country like Pakistan, OTOH....

18 posted on 09/09/2002 8:52:52 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
The journey of a thousand furlongs begins with one step....
19 posted on 09/09/2002 8:46:35 PM PDT by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Is it at all likely that a bolide would be mistaken for a nuke blast?

In a heartbeat ..... the flash signature would be registered first and THAT is what they would react on.

Over a populated area with thousands dead in America; NORAD might think that someone had just dropped weapons from a FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment) satellite.

20 posted on 09/09/2002 8:51:55 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson