WHEN DECENCY LEFT AMERICA; STINKY HATE-FILLED ANTI-AMERICAN BIGOTS

etherzone.com ^ | 9/26/02 | Dave Franklin

[1bigdictator]

WHEN DECENCY LEFT AMERICA STINKY HATE-FILLED ANTI-AMERICAN BIGOTS

By: Dave Franklin

There is still a social sub-culture that represents the morally bankrupt leach-Americana. Un-bathed, rancid, America-bashing dope heads continue preaching anti-patriotic hatred. They are opposed to decent people whose taxes pay for the colleges around which they orbit in concealed hives where the only objectives in life are drugs, licentiousness, and promoting socialism.

Beginning in the mid-1950s with a beatnik cult movement that later germinated at Woodstock, a post-modern breed of maggotry infested America. It would be nice if we could dismiss this as an artifact of history, but the impact it has on our nation still soils American culture. From burnt out baby-boomers, to Kurt blow-brain Nirvana heroin addicts and today's ecstasy-laced techno-raves, America suffers amoral anti-religious bigots who attempt to excuse their hate by supporting "free love".

What most Americans don't know is the hippie-disco-grunge-punk-rave poison dissolved into our great patriotic society has its origins in the same philosophy that killed millions in Stalin's gulag. In the 1930s, when Hitler was taking over Germany, those who claimed to be intellectuals preaching Marxism in European coffeehouses realized they were targets of the Nazis. In an effort to escape persecution, many of them came to America.

They settled in places like Greenwich Village, Haight-Ashbury, and near universities such as Berkeley where they could live on the cheap as they spread their humanist anti-Christian lies to America's young adults. A strong patriotic war effort kept them on ice until the end of World War II. But by the time the swelled ranks of baby-boom students began entering college, a potent sans-American communist "world view" had established roots and began choking the greatest nation on earth.

Seven decades later, America is still threatened by this clandestine movement toward world socialism. Instead of peaceful protests against the anti-national globalist World Bank, WTO, and IMF, the streets of Seattle and Washington D.C. were speckled with blood as our computers rolled over into the year 2000. Today, homeland insecurity-conscious officials are banning protests at the IMF and World Bank meetings in Washington D.C.

Instead of Americans exercising a First Amendment right to assemble and petition their government for redress of grievances, these communists and anarchists threaten the peace in our nation's capital. That gives baby-boomer bureaucrats a perfect excuse to stifle free speech, though many of them were part of a lamentable period in American history marked by the same kind of unruly protests.

In 1967, thousands of Americans were conceived during what is now affectionately called the "summer of love", but should be referred to as the summer of whoremongering. In 1968, women who carried those children realized they could not have an abortion because murdering the unborn was illegal. So, as the pressure was increasing, Governor Ronald Reagan (R-CA) signed legislation that allowed abortion for the health of a mother. When 1968 was over, the number abortions in California grew to 100,000 each year (compared to 518 in 1967) as love-child-killing women received an easy diagnosis of being "unfit to have a baby for mental health reasons".

By 1973, the whole country submitted. Based on a lie, the Supreme Court ruled that any law banning abortion was in violation of a woman's rights, "nevermind" a baby's right to live. Still, women who have an abortion are emotionally scarred. And the self-inflicted damage to an American society that kills millions of its innocent unborn, thereby permanently changing women's ideas of motherhood and ruining American morality, is untold.

Such is the price paid for a license allowing people to ignore their obligations. If Americans want sex without consequences, they will also have a society without regard to individual responsibility. Is it any wonder we have a pop-culture built on narcissistic expression by people who only care about themselves? Could America have expected any more than a President who embarrassed them in front of their children?

Remember that it was the same hippie blame-America-first crowd, along with a "boxers or briefs" MTV generation, that put Bill Clinton in office and then re-elected him. And it was that bunch who protested Gingrich while claiming that "even Presidents have private lives", as the U.S. Senate gave Clinton a pass after he made a mockery out of our judicial system. George Bush may want to let bygones be bygones, but we are still living with Lewinsky's self-loathing pop.

For all that we've been through, find a hippie, or a punk, or a raver and ask them why they hate their country. Or maybe you can just tell them to start acting like a decent individual, worthy of the rights that were secured for them by American patriots who fought, bled, and died on battlefields so they could be free. They may ask, what would we do without abortion, a radical gay agenda, flag-burning, violent protests, or drugs?

Well, the answer to that is simple. America would just be a free country where people can raise their families. Kids could go to school without their parents worrying about them being shot or stabbed. Illicit drug use would be a non-issue in America. And men who conceive children would understand they have responsibility to posterity that compels them to become committed husbands and fathers. A nation that hopes to remain free requires no less.

This truth means humanist world tyranny, which seeks to dominate the lives of every American, stands in opposition to decency. Pursuant to their damnable goals, stinky hate-filled anti-American bigots continue the cultural infection of our society. And such tomfoolery demands much of Christians that believe we should love those who hate us.

[SandfleaCSC]

This idiot writes like he just got a blood transfusion from Jesse Helms and Pat Buchanan.

[rdb3]

I somewhat agree with your sentiment. But this author has it wrong on this front: There really isn't such a thing as a purely "American culture."

"American culture" is truly a culture of cultures.

So his premise breaks down immediately.

[BlueLancer]

"WHEN DECENCY LEFT AMERICA; STINKY HATE-FILLED ANTI-AMERICAN BIGOTS"

Take that, you poo-poo heads!

[PaulJ]

Are you sure this article wasn't really written by Ed Anger at the Weekly World News?

[dighton]

"I’m madder than a Nazi prison camp commandant with a foggy monocle."

[Uncle Miltie]

Perhaps we can encourage the wacko-left to decamp to Baghdad, and fight with Saddam against the Great Satan.

[FreeTally]

For all that we've been through, find a hippie, or a punk, or a raver and ask them why they hate their country.

Ravers and punks hate America? What the heck is this guy talking about?

Or maybe you can just tell them to start acting like a decent individual, worthy of the rights that were secured for them by American patriots who fought, bled, and died on battlefields so they could be free.

Worthy of rights? I thought we were all endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights? This guy has set up a "worthiness" test?

They may ask, what would we do without abortion, a radical gay agenda, flag-burning, violent protests, or drugs? Well, the answer to that is simple. America would just be a free country where people can raise their families.

People can't raise their families because of flag burning or drugs? Damn, this country must have fallen apart and I misssed it.

Kids could go to school without their parents worrying about them being shot or stabbed.

My parents never worried about this one time, and I suspect most parents do not either.

Illicit drug use would be a non-issue in America.

It should be a non-issue, you dufus(author), because its none of your damn business what people put in their bodies.

This guy has a few valid points, but he still has this mindset that the lack of freedom makes us more free.

[MHGinTN]

Damn, this country must have fallen apart and I misssed it. Yes, by your own admission, you missed it!... or were/are a part of the demolition crew.

[Orual]

[FreeTally]

Yes, by your own admission, you missed it!... or were/are a part of the demolition crew.

Yep, America's a wasteland, one of the poorest countries in the world. Such a horrible place to live.....

[swarthyguy]

So because i like the stones and rock and roll and jazz, i'm worse than a jihadi?

This guy is nuts. THis is a really ill formed article.

So much for the unity in the aftermath of the September Attacks.

This guy needs to fix his personal life. He didn't get laid in the summer of love or something. Or his wife left him for some longhaired musician, like Charlie Daniels or Willie Nelson?

So, like James Watts, he agrees the Beach Boys are a tool of Satan.

[GOP_1900AD]

Latter day brain flatulance. The culture of the USA is in the main a highly unique British colonial one. You've fallen for the revisionism yourself and are impacted by one of the many corrosive currents this article either mentions or implies. Any time I see so called "Conservatives" sharing such sentiments here, I must allude to what J.R. Nyquist wrote "the Right is a fiction [nearly] everyone is on the Left."

[rdb3]

Nonsense.

Are the regional cultures of the Midwest the same as they are in the South? But both are American, right?

I've fallen for nothing.

When I said "culture of cultures," I wasn't referring to foreign cultures. I'm speaking specifically of the cultures formed and maintained within America. Perhaps you should ask the question before you begin to assume.

[MHGinTN]

You don't have eyes to see the truth apparently. The economic strength of America is fading, following the moral strength in a rapid descending suck. I see you are part of the demolition squad, playing denial games in an immature blindness to the facts.

[Billy_bob_bob]

I was wondering if anyone was going to comment on that one. Indeed, there is an "American culture". It is what we have left over after filtering out the more noxious components of the cultures we have assimilated. There is indeed, most certainly, an American culture.

Once we recognize that, perhaps we might endeavor to try to preserve some remnant of what little American culture we have left, before it is lost forever in the roaring bonfires of "multiculturalism" and "tolerance" and "diversity". Because there some cultures that are simply too different and too hostile to our culture to ever be assimilated, unless our strategy involves destroying ourselves in the name of being acceptable to those who wish to conquer us.

Why do I feel like I just revealed State Secret #1?

[Billy_bob_bob]

S/B "Because there ARE some cultures" - OOPS!

[Wallace T.]

The rise of what was once called the counterculture to ascendancy in this country cannot solely be traced to the emigration of Marxist-Gramscian intellectuals like Theodor Adorno or Herbert Marcuse to America. There are other threads: the effects of John Dewey and William James on American education, from kindergarten to graduate school, and philosophy, the collapse of orthodox Biblical belief in the mainline Protestant churches, the existing Communist/Socialist movement in America, both native born and immigrant, and the effects of 19th Century evolutionary theory and skepticism on many of the leading authors and thinkers of the century before last. Perhaps the European Marxist Gramscians provided the ignition for the rise of the barbarous culture that prevails today, but there was plenty of homegrown tinder with which to work.

There is an American culture and a distinct American identity. From at least the time of Washington Irving, Americans regarded themselves, and were regarded as foreigners, as a breed different than the subjects of the British monarch. American culture is European in origin, Chinese restaurants and jazz clubs notwithstanding, with the British strain predominant in our laws, language, and folk culture, the last particularly in the South.

The moral underpinnings of Anglo-American law derived from Biblical concepts, as seen in the writings of Blackstone. (Some Founding Fathers, notably Franklin and Jefferson, were deists, but their rejection of Christianity was confined to the supernatural elements, e.g., the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ. 18th Century Unitarians and Deists did not reject the Decalogue.) At its founding, the American nation was overwhelmingly Protestant and heavily Calvinist. While Catholics, Mormons, and Jews became prominent minorities in this country during the 19th Century, the moral codes of those faiths were virtually the same as that of the Protestant majority. By and large, the non-British Protestant immigrants contributed to this country by their labor and ingenuity, and are not responsible for the rise of sexual immorality or the predominance of situation ethics.

While the author of this article overemphasizes the role of European Marxist Gramscian intellectuals in the transformation (or properly the deformation) of our nation, he is entirely correct in his belief that America has (or had) a distinct culture. It is also one that is worth preserving.

[GOP_1900AD]

At the national level, yes they are the same. According to your argument, in the mother country, the scouser would be from a different "culture" than the high brow southerner. What you are refering to are actually subcultures but not distinct national cultures. We are splitting hairs here, I think we actually agree.