Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Say Iraq To Give UN Unfettered Access
Reuters/Yahoo ^ | 9-29-2002 | Randy Fabi

Posted on 09/29/2002 2:58:28 PM PDT by blam

Democrats Say Iraq to Give UN Unfettered Access

Sun Sep 29, 4:44 PM ET
By Randy Fabi

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Three Democratic U.S. congressmen said on Sunday from Baghdad that Iraq would provide unfettered access to U.N. inspectors, but Republican senators were skeptical.

Congress is expected to begin debate this week on a resolution giving President Bush the power he wants to attack Iraq. Some Democrats want the Republican Bush to exhaust diplomatic measures before going to war, and to limit the president's war powers.

With the November U.S. mid-term elections looming, Iraq has stolen the national spotlight from the sluggish economy and other troublesome domestic issues.

Democratic Representatives Jim McDermott of Washington, Mike Thompson of California and David Bonior of Michigan, in Iraq to assess the humanitarian situation, said Baghdad should be allowed to comply with U.N. demands without the looming threat of U.S. military action.

"They (Iraqi officials) said they would allow us to go look anywhere we wanted," McDermott said on ABC's "This Week.." "And until they don't do that, there is no need to do this coercive stuff where you bring in helicopters and armed people and storm buildings."

The Democrats said they met with Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri and Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz, who promised "unrestricted, unfettered" access.

"I think you have to take Iraqis on their face value," McDermott said. "We don't have to pass a resolution in the Congress or in the (U.N.) Security Council right now."

The three visited the southern port city of Basra on Sunday to check the living conditions and health of civilians after more than a decade of U.N. sanctions.

Their visit came as Baghdad said U.S. jets had raided the civilian airport in Basra for the second time in a week. In Tampa, Florida, U.S. Central Command said it had targeted a military mobile radar at Basra "in response to hostile acts."

REPUBLICANS EXPRESS DOUBT

Republican senators expressed doubts that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein would allow U.N. inspectors complete access.

"He's not going to allow them back in, because he has these weapons and materials and laboratories and he isn't about to give them up," Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona said on CNN's "Late Edition."

Iraq rejected on Saturday a draft-U.S. proposed Security Council resolution requiring it to comply with new arms inspection rules within 30 days or face military action.

The Democratic-controlled Senate is expected to begin debate this week on a resolution authorizing a strike against Iraq. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives is due to take up the measure in mid-October.

"I don't believe Saddam Hussein will do what he has to do," Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott said on CBS's "Face the Nation. "But this president will take every possible effort to make sure that he does comply. And if he does, then maybe action won't be necessary."

U.N. weapons inspectors were sent to Iraq after the Gulf War but left in December 1998 saying Baghdad was obstructing their work. They have not been allowed back since.

McDermott said Bush "would mislead the American people" on Iraq. "It would not surprise me if they came with some information that is not provable, and they've shifted," he said.

Republican Sen. Don Nickles of Oklahoma said the three Democrats sounded like "spokespersons for the Iraqi government."


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: access; democrats; iraq; un; unfettered
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
These SOB's Are desperate.
1 posted on 09/29/2002 2:58:29 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Are the Dems cutting a deal with Saddam?????
2 posted on 09/29/2002 3:01:20 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
haha

Saddam has no weapons of mass destruction because he told me so.

3 posted on 09/29/2002 3:03:46 PM PDT by expatguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Who to believe....
Iraq defiantly rejected a U.S.-British plan Saturday for the United Nations ( news - web sites) to force President Saddam Hussein ( news - web sites) to disarm and open his palaces for weapons searches, warning the Baghdad would stage a fierce defense if the allies attacked.

Iraq Rejects Disarmament Plan

4 posted on 09/29/2002 3:04:10 PM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The sad thing is, no one remembers this stuff six weeks after it's said. They get a pass because they belong to the political class.
5 posted on 09/29/2002 3:07:00 PM PDT by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

EVERYONE NEEDS A HELPING HAND! SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC TODAY! VOTE REPUBLICAN!

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!
DONATE TONIGHT
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate here by secure server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

6 posted on 09/29/2002 3:10:52 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Mr. McDermott, did the Iraqis let you go where ever you wanted to go? Were you "unrestricted and unfettered"?

Proof that these three democrats are traitors and should be charged with Treason.

Or better yet, force them to stay in Baghdad!
7 posted on 09/29/2002 3:16:45 PM PDT by tonyinv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tonyinv
This McDermott fellow wouldn't know a "weapon of mass destruction" from a BB gun.

Except that he would want to prohibit the distribution of BB guns. A kid might shoot his own eye out, you know.
8 posted on 09/29/2002 3:24:11 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: dalebert
Like Scott Ritter did?
10 posted on 09/29/2002 3:25:46 PM PDT by TechJunkYard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
The question remains " Who do you believe Saddam or the Dems?"
11 posted on 09/29/2002 3:34:00 PM PDT by blastdad51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blastdad51
Trent Lott says these traitors need to come home and keep their mouths shut...
12 posted on 09/29/2002 3:35:28 PM PDT by GRRRRR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
I love that headline:

DEMOCRATS Say Iraq to Give UN Unfettered Access

If I were in charge of the Democratic Party, I would rather have Moe, Larry and Curly speaking for the party than these three idiots.

13 posted on 09/29/2002 3:37:00 PM PDT by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
THESE are dead children, previously playing in Halabja [March 1988].
Terrorist Saddam used chemical weapons against his own people
until the "streets were piled with corpses."
Their murders are now defended by Democrats, including the traitors to the USA and victims of the 911 Atrocities,
currently seeking favor in Iraq.


14 posted on 09/29/2002 4:03:21 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR
Trent Lott says these traitors need to come home and keep their mouths shut...

What's with Lott lately.......

is he growing a spine?

15 posted on 09/29/2002 4:11:09 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Even Lott get's it right once in a while...just saw the clip again on FOX...he actually names McDermott and says it's disgraceful that they are in Baghdad and take issue with our President...
16 posted on 09/29/2002 4:16:07 PM PDT by GRRRRR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR
McDermott was the one the Florida couple (John and Alice Martin, longtime Democrats active in the National Education Association) passed the illegally recorded tape of Gingrich to.

[Under federal law, someone convicted of monitoring cellular phone conversations and passing them on to another party can face up to $250,000 in fines and six years in prison.]

This slimeball doesn't necessarily trust Saddam--he's just willing to sacrifice America's security to block a president from the opposite party.

McDermott and his butt-buddy Saddam both need a thermobaric enema.

17 posted on 09/29/2002 4:54:58 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam
These SOB's are going to end up with egg on their face. What am I saying...they've already got egg on their face. They must like being the laughing stock of the country...not to mention the world.
18 posted on 09/29/2002 5:06:28 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If you do the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result, you are ________ (fill in the blank).
19 posted on 09/29/2002 5:11:51 PM PDT by etcetera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Here is the question that has formed in my head:

Which is/was a bigger threat to our nation's security: Bosnia or Iraq?

When I look at that question it really makes the demorats' actions suspect.
20 posted on 09/29/2002 5:14:27 PM PDT by TheLooseThread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson