Definitely a "good news, bad news" scenario.
1 posted on
10/16/2002 8:22:11 AM PDT by
cogitator
To: cogitator
The new findings are important because scientists have not been able to balance the carbon budget. There is less carbon dioxide stored in the atmosphere than researchers estimate is emitted from fossil fuel burning or tropical deforestation or absorbed by the ocean.I read the article being that a semi-honest scientist is attempting to prove the lies of previous true believer scientists and they can't true the facts. It's because the previous statements were based on lies and the truth is exposing the prior untruths.
The other statements are garbage put in so they don't get the same treatment from their peers as the fellow from Scandinavia who took heat for telling the environmental truth.
2 posted on
10/16/2002 8:48:22 AM PDT by
Thebaddog
To: cogitator
Do the satellites also monitor how maqny people died due to lack of acess to basic sanitation and hygene?
4 posted on
10/16/2002 9:14:08 AM PDT by
sanchmo
To: cogitator
What's interesting is the Amazon Rain Forest is a net emittor of Carbon Dioxide. In other words- it produces more than it sequesters.
To: farmfriend
`
9 posted on
09/09/2003 7:54:38 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
To: countrydummy
`
10 posted on
09/09/2003 8:03:19 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson