Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yemeni killed in CIA strike tied to alleged N.Y. cell
USA Today / AP ^ | 11/9/2002 | Staff

Posted on 11/09/2002 7:02:32 AM PST by ex-Texan

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:05 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (AP)

(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: ahmedhijazi; alqaeda; alqaedainny; buffalocell; hijazi; lackawannacell; lackawannasix; nyalqaedalinks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Lott is correct. We must shut down our borders. It is imperative for our national security. Enforce the laws that are on the books ...... To do otherwise may is suicidal. The INS must be purged of Democratic party corruption immediately.

F'democratic party corruption ... < / my rant>

1 posted on 11/09/2002 7:02:32 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Interesting connection Bump.
2 posted on 11/09/2002 7:07:00 AM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The attack has drawn criticism from human rights circles. On Friday, Amnesty International sent letters to U.S. and Yemeni officials seeking information on the attacks. An Amnesty International spokesman in Washington said Thursday that the U.S. attack violates international treaties prohibiting summary executions done without the due process of law.

They didn't do anthing about 9/11. Go figure

3 posted on 11/09/2002 7:17:06 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The INS must be purged of Democratic party corruption immediately.

A non-union homeland defence bill could do just that. Heh heh heh. Strategery!

4 posted on 11/09/2002 7:23:33 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
LOL LOL LOL !
5 posted on 11/09/2002 7:27:53 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Only one of the men, Sahim Alwan, 29, was granted bail...probably rolled over on the others and gave information that led to killers in car being identified.
6 posted on 11/09/2002 7:36:41 AM PST by RWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Thanks for posting this.

Did Amenesty International ever say anything about the 3,000 innocent Americans killed on 9/11/2001.

Has Amenesty International ever complained when an Islamakazi killed himself and innocent Jewish people under orders of Arafatty and financed by the Islamofascist Elite Opec Thugs?
7 posted on 11/09/2002 7:48:22 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: greasyHeart
Thanks for posting this. Sometimes I get raked over the coals by Freepers when I say follow the money from the Opecker Princes and the IslamoFascist Thugs in charge of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lybia, ?.

"Amnesty International has more than a million members and supporters in over 140 countries and territories. Amnesty International is impartial and independent of any government, political persuasion or religious creed. Our work is financed largely by subscriptions and donations from our worldwide membership."

OPEC has lots of money to give away...

Once we destroy Opec, the flow of their blood money will stop. Combine that with the death of all key al Qaeda thugs and IslamoFascist thugs, and we will see terrorism drop like a rock.

Also, these anti American, phoney non profits that are funded by Opec $'s will disappear for the good of the world.

9 posted on 11/09/2002 8:07:19 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
An Amnesty International spokesman in Washington said Thursday that the U.S. attack violates international treaties prohibiting summary executions done without the due process of law.

This is idiotic. If we kill terrorists and innocent bystanders, that's unacceptable because we're wantonly murdering civilians. Okay. If we kill terrorists without killing any innocent bystanders, that's an "illegal summary execution".

They'd seriously like us to believe that it's always possible to go into Indian country and successfully apprehend these dudes alive -- no doubt Mirandizing them in the process? (I say "successfully apprehend," because any bunch of idiots can mount an expedition to try to apprehend them, but it only matters if you get the job done.)

Would Amnesty Internation have objected to the June, 1944 officers' plot to kill Hitler, which was run in part by British intelligence? Wasn't that an "illegal summary execution"?

10 posted on 11/09/2002 8:12:54 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Lott is correct

Please site your reference for this remark.

11 posted on 11/09/2002 8:14:42 AM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
the U.S. attack violates international treaties prohibiting summary executions done without the due process of law.

Al Queda has brought these attacks on themselves by declaring war on the US and her allies. I have no problem with the CIA hunting them down and killing them. To NOT do so would only put us in greater danger because those folks just WILL NOT STOP!

If an American is working with Al Queda, he has chosen his own fate.

12 posted on 11/09/2002 8:42:48 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWG
Only one of the men, Sahim Alwan, 29, was granted bail...probably rolled over on the others and gave information that led to killers in car being identified.

Actually as of last week he was still cooling his heels in the County jail.

The family has not been able to meet all the bail requirements.

Is he dealing? I do not think so..but it is only a guess

13 posted on 11/09/2002 8:50:59 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Lott was quoted as supporting the use of U.S. troop to help guard our borders. Saw the article on FR. Look it up.
14 posted on 11/09/2002 8:51:25 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; Sabertooth
The other night they showed a new border defense system on local TV..It seems it has been installed here.

The Border Patrol agents were explaining it..some kind of high tec ultra microwave heat sensing camera system that will see and record pics in real time of folks attempting to cross the Niagara river illegally.That will allow for a welcoming party to meet them

My question is ..If this tecnology has been available for a while (which they indicated ) Why is it not used on the southern border?

Both parties love the Mexican illegals ..but that is too bad..all borders need to be CLOSED

15 posted on 11/09/2002 8:57:05 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: ex-Texan
But but but cutie katie couric said just because they attended those 'camps' doesn't mean they're terrorists......
17 posted on 11/09/2002 9:16:54 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexVet
Isn't the INS one of the agencies that's scheduled to be purged/merged under Homeland Defense?

Yep.heh heh heh.

18 posted on 11/09/2002 10:08:12 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The INS must be purged of Democratic party corruption

Did you happen to see the article that was printed from a Mexico City paper, regarding the election? It stated that there was disappointment in Mexico because the Democrats has promised action on a migrant worker treaty that Bush has opposed.

What Democrat made these promises?

Also, I was told my a mother of a border patrol officer that the border patrol has been ordered to not apprehend any illegals because they did not want the numbers on the books. They said that they were afraid that it would upset the voters if they saw the actual numbers.

I have made this statement so many times that I am getting tired of repeating it, but no one seems to think that it is significant. If anyone heard the border patrol officer from Blaine on the O'Reilly show, they would have no doubt that the border patrol has been politicized, as well.

19 posted on 11/09/2002 10:53:29 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The apparent killing of a U.S. citizen, even an alleged terrorist killed collaterally, threatens to draw the CIA into murky waters.

Bulltwaddle -- shall the CIA be required to give preferential treatment to a terrorist who is a US citizen by accident of birth? Shall all operations around the world be stymied by the need to check birth records? Does it matter where someone who is actively planning to destroy Americans is born? Should you ask someone in the act of detonating a bomb where he was born?

This reasoning is about as stupid as requiring cops who are being shot at, to try to arrest someone without drawing weapons.

You do the crime, you do the time, with Allah.

20 posted on 11/09/2002 12:15:59 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson