Posted on 11/09/2002 4:23:27 PM PST by GeneD
Filed at 6:59 p.m. ET
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- Egypt's foreign minister said Saturday that he expected Iraq to accept the U.N. resolution to disarm but that Baghdad had not yet made a formal decision.
``I think we can expect a positive position by the Iraqis,'' Ahmed Maher told reporters after Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri explained Iraq's position to the foreign ministers of the 22-member Arab League.
``We heard the Iraqi point of view and the history of relations with the United Nations and the inspectors and their readiness to cooperate ... already expressed in September, but they haven't yet taken the formal decision on their attitude toward the resolution,'' Maher said.
Nabil Shaath, the Palestinian representative at the meeting, said Iraq had in effect accepted the resolution, but Arab foreign ministers still wanted assurances that the Security Council blueprint did not contain an automatic trigger allowing the United States to wage war on Iraq.
However, Sabri later told reporters ``no decision has been taken'' on the resolution that demands Iraq eliminate its weapons of mass destruction or face ``serious consequences.''
The first word of the Iraqi position came when Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal left the meeting shortly before midnight Saturday, saying, ``I think everyone welcomed transferring the issue to the Security Council, and they welcomed Iraq's approval of this decision with the confirmation that Syria received that there would be no automatic military action.''
In a surprise move, Syria joined other U.N. Security Council members in voting for the resolution on Thursday, making passage of the resolution unanimous.
During the session, Sabri met privately with Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk al-Sharaa, who apparently briefed him on assurances from the United States that it would not use force before giving Iraq a chance to prove its cooperation with weapons inspectors.
Earlier Saturday, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher met with both Sabri and the U.S. ambassador to Egypt, David Welch, who pointed out the resolution was consistent with Arab League decisions urging Iraq's compliance with U.N. resolutions.
Sabri gave no hint on how Iraq would respond to the latest resolution, which requires Baghdad to reply within seven days, allowing U.N. weapons inspectors back into the country with a tougher mandate to seek out hidden weapons.
``Baghdad will study the resolution and we will take a decision later,'' Sabri told reporters after meeting Maher.
In Baghdad, the official Iraqi news agency kept up an Iraqi barrage of criticism of the United States for pushing through the strongly worded resolution, calling the document ``bad and unjust.''
Sabri said, however, that in the long negotiations over passage the international community succeeded in diluting U.S. plans for aggression on Iraq.
While Arab officials have made clear they expected Iraq to accept the resolution within the seven-day deadline, Arab League spokesman Hisham Youssef made a bow to Iraq when he described how the Arab diplomats were dealing with the question in their meetings.
``They will hear Iraq's comments on the resolution, and every country will give its reading of the situation, but the decision will be made in Iraq,'' he said after Saturday's session got underway.
Maher, the Egyptian foreign minister, pointed out that Iraq already had said it would accept the arms inspectors back unconditionally and added he saw that as a signal for what the Iraqi decision would be.
``I think that after the issuing of the resolution, Iraq will deal with it in the same spirit. This is what we hope,'' he said.
Political analyst Abdel Moneim Said of Egypt's Al Ahram Center for Strategic Studies said the resolution would help Arab efforts to persuade Iraq to accept U.N. demands and avoid a war that could oust Saddam's regime.
``The issue was redefined as an issue of weapons of mass destruction, and no longer a regime change,'' he said. ``Iraqis know that any little mistake will cost them a war.'' Arab officials and commentators said the resolution -- revised to satisfy French and Russian concerns -- had at least set back the chance of war. But some expressed fear that Washington still could use the document as an excuse to attack Baghdad at the earliest opportunity.
Jordanian political analyst Labib Kamhawi said President Bush would see the resolution and his Republican Party's victory in congressional elections as erasing the last obstacles to a war to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
``He believes that he has his mandate both from his people and the United Nations to launch his war on Iraq,'' Kamhawi said.
And later in the article, "the resolution would help Arab efforts to persuade Iraq...."
Arab pressures to Saddam: You will comply....got it?
Iraq reportedly accepts UN resolution, as new US war plan leaked
As Baghdad reportedly accepted a United Nations resolution on Iraqi disarmament and a new US war plan is leaked to the media, up to a million march for peace in Italy.
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal told an Arab League foreign ministers meeting here that Baghdad had accepted the UN resolution after obtaining assurances from UN Security Council member Syria that the resolution did not forsee automatic recourse to military action.
The new measure imposes a stringent arms inspection regimen on Baghdad and warns of "serious consequences" if it does not disarm. It gives President Saddam Hussein until November 15 to accept the text.
"The Arab ministers welcomed Iraq's acceptance of Resolution 1441, following assurances from Syria that this resolution does not provide for automatic military action (against Baghdad)," the minister told reporters in Cairo.
Prince al-Faisal spoke after a meeting of Arab League foreign ministers at the League's headquarters here. The ministers are due to continue their meeting on Sunday.
On the margins of Saturday's meeting, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri met his counterpart from Syria, the only Arab nation currently sitting in the 15-nation Security Council.
Sabri said he had voted for the resolution on disarming Iraq after receiving assurances it would not be a green light for a US-led strike on Baghdad.
"In no provision of this resolution is there anything that allows countries to take unilateral action," Syria's deputy ambassador to the United Nations, Fayssal Mekdad, told the BBC.
State radio in Damascus reported Saturday that Syria voted in favour of the resolution only to avoid a US military strike on Baghdad which would benefit Israel.
Meanwhile the New York Times reported in its Sunday edition that US war plans on Iraq approved by President George W. Bush include a shorter air campaign than in the 1991 Gulf War, but deployment of up to 250,000 troops.
The air campaign would last less than a month and would build on lessons learned in Afghanistan, such as using infiltrated commandos to help guide precision-guided missiles to their target, according to the Times, quoting unnamed senior administration officials.
The plan also envisions US forces capturing three zones -- in northern, western and southern Iraq -- to be used as operational bases, the Time reported.
"While we would not want to kill many Iraqi soldiers, if they stupidly fight, we will," a senior military official told the Times.
The war plan was approved well before the Friday vote at the United Nations, according to the Times.
In Florence, Italy, between 400,000 and one million people -- according to respective police and organizers' estimates -- braved the cold and marched peacefully through the city opposing a war on Iraq in what could prove to be the world's biggest street protest yet.
Demonstrators leading the march carried banners proclaiming "No to War" as the huge rally wove along a three-kilometer (1.8 mile) stretch that skirted Florence's historic center and ended up at the city's football stadium. The mood remained festive, with no reported incidents.
In late September, protests against US policy on Iraq were staged in Washington and other world capitals, but the largest of these -- in London and Rome -- only drew about 100,000 people each.
Capitalizing on their success, organizers called for holding on February 15 a Europe-wide protest to oppose war in Iraq.
In London, comments by Britain's International Development Secretary, Clare Short indicated tensions on the Iraq policy within Prime Minister Tony Blair's cabinet.
Short, an outspoken leftwing minister, said it was "essential" to deal with the disarming of Iraq through the UN and to maintain international unity -- and it was up to the Security Council to decide whether military action should be launched if Iraq fails to disarm.
Earlier Saturday, Britain's ambassador to the UN, Jeremy Greenstock, said a new UN resolution may have to be hammered out if Iraq refuses to cooperate with UN inspectors.
Iraqi state-run television has reiterated that the country was free of the weapons of mass destruction, which were supposed to be scrapped under Resolution 1441.
Give that man a cigar!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.