Some Proposed Amendments(TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION)

The Constitution is a living and evolving document. One of the ways that the Constitution is changed is through the amendment process. It can be an arduous process, requiring agreement by many different segments of society and the government, and it does not always work out. But it is the only way to make a permanent change to the Constitution. Changes in interpretation are common as time progresses, but only by having actual text added can a change be called a part of the Constitution.

In every session of Congress, dozens of Constitutional Amendments are proposed. Almost never do any of them become actual Amendments. In fact, almost never do any of them even get out of committee.

It is interesting to see, however, the types of things our legislators want to do the Constitution. Proposed amendments are a reflection of the mood of the nation, or of a subset of the population.

These lists are simple bullets, not detailed examinations of the proposed amendments, the bills that carried them, or the process they went through. If a further examination is desired, a search of the Thomas database can be done.

Please note that some proposed amendments are proposed over and over again in different sessions of Congress. For the sake of brevity, I have used the 102nd Congress as a "baseline" and each subsequent Congress has only new ideas for amendments listed. Also note that just because a proposed amendment is not listed in prior sessions does not mean it was not proposed in prior sessions.

Here's some more from Constitution facts:

One of the enduring features of our Constitution is its flexibility. At the time of its ratification, the population of the United States was around 4 million and today that population exceeds 270 million. Since its adoption the Constitution has only changed 27 times! Actually, since 1791 (with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights) it has only changed 16 times. That is an amazing fact considering the changes in technology, infrastructure, population, etc. in this country in more than 200 years. The framers of the Constitution realized that no document could cover all of the changes that would take place to ensure its longevity . In order for an amendment to be passed, a number of steps must be taken as outlined in Article V. The article provides for two methods for the proposal and two methods for the ratification of an amendment. An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of the House of Representatives and the Senate or a national convention called by Congress at the request of 2/3 of the state legislatures. The latter procedure has never been used. The amendment may then be ratified by 3/4 of the state legislatures (38 states) or special conventions called in 3/4 of the states. The 21st amendment was the only one to be adopted in this way. However, it is the power of Congress to decide which method of ratification will be used.

The time limit for the ratification process of seven years was first applied to the Eighteenth Amendment, and the decision concerning a "reasonable" time period for ratification is determined by Congress according to the Supreme Court case Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939). There have been close to 10,000 amendments proposed in Congress since 1789, and only a fraction of a percentage of those receive enough support to actually go through the constitutional ratification process. The success rate of an amendment to become part of the Constitution is less than 1%. The following is a very limited list of some of those proposed amendments that never left the halls of Congress:

1876: An attempt to abolish the United States Senate

1876: The forbidding of religious leaders from occupying a governmental office or receiving federal funding

1878: An Executive Council of Three should replace the office of President

1893: Renaming this nation the "United States of the Earth"

1893: Abolishing the United States Army and Navy

1894: Acknowledging that the Constitution recognize God and Jesus Christ as the supreme authorities in human affairs.

1912: Making marriage between races illegal

1914: Finding divorce to be illegal

1916: All acts of war should be put to a national vote. Anyone voting yes has to register as a volunteer for service in the United States Army

1933: An attempt to limit the personal wealth to $1 million

1938: The forbidding of drunkenness in the United States and all of its territories

1947: The income tax maximum for an individual should not exceed 25%

1948: The right of citizens to segregate themselves from others

1971: American citizens should have the alienable right to an environment free of pollution.

The gun control nuts want to eliminate the 2nd Amendment. I have news for them:

1. It will never happen, as there is no way on Earth that 3/4 of the state legislatures will agree with that sick proposition.

2. Even IF it does happen, the innate right to defend oneself cannot be amended away, any more than the right to worship how, when and if you want to can be amended away. The fact that 80 million+ people own 250 million+ guns is ample evidence for me that for practical purposes it is impossible to eliminate this most fundamental of rights. Put quite simply, I believe that many Congresscritters, state legislators, newspaper and media types who advocated such a repeal would, if the attempt looked like it was going to be successful, would not survive to see if it actually was successful.

While I would never threaten anyone with physical violence, or act upon such a threat, nor advocate that anyone else do so, I would say: DON'T F#$% WITH THE 2ND AMENDMENT.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.