Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
Gosh, I wonder what IS in Trent's FBI file?

That was my first thought when I heard that Lott had struck a deal prior to the elections not to take control of the lame duck session regardles of the outcome of the Talent race.
6 posted on 11/19/2002 6:30:34 PM PST by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: AdA$tra
That move by Trent Lott was not a bad idea.

The real concern on both sides was that the Senate could have changes hands a total of 3 times from Election Day to next January. Consider the following scenario: 1) Talent takes Carnahan's seat immediately, and gives control to the Republicans; 2) Jesse Ventura appoints a Democrat to fill Wellstone's seat; and 3) Republicans win control of the Senate on Election Day, but this doesn't take effect until January. Beyond that, it was possible that the final control of the Senate in January would not be decided until the December run-off in Louisiana.

That agreement between Lott and Daschle wasn't because of a lack of backbone on either side -- it was to avoid the potential chaos that would have resulted if the Senate changed hands multiple times between Election Day and January 1st.

21 posted on 11/19/2002 7:01:53 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson