To: jimbo123
From what I've read of Steven Seagal, his hands are not entirely clean either. Besides being a flake, he's supposed to be a real prick to work with. Another Hollywood looney with too much time and too much money, who starts to believe his own PR ooze.
4 posted on
11/22/2002 3:39:31 PM PST by
IronJack
To: IronJack
he's supposed to be a real p---- to work with. HOw does this make his hands "not clean?"
8 posted on
11/22/2002 3:54:31 PM PST by
TopQuark
To: IronJack
I happen to like to watch Steven Seagal,he is a differant actor than most hollywood has to offer.Yes,his screenplays are not the best but he has something most actors do not in a violent scene,control.I have watched just about every martial art movie there is but, seagal has the look that maybe he's been there before.I realy know nothing about him personaly,I realy never cared,but I heard he was capable of actualy doing real time what you see him do on the screen .Any one care to comment on what they realy know about seagal?I would like to know.
To: IronJack
From what I've read of Steven Seagal, his hands are not entirely clean either. Several years ago when he made the film 'Fire Down Below' a good part of it was filmed in Kentucky where my daughter lives. Way out in the boonies.
She got to know a lot of the crew pretty well. One of them told her they had to stop filming because in one of the fight scenes Seagal actually hit who he was fighting with. Little Stevie had to go wash his hands before continuing the scene. Crew considered him a big over rated jerk.
16 posted on
11/22/2002 4:36:09 PM PST by
barker
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson