Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lessismore
You know, what stood out most to me in this article is not the matter of the technology available to terrorists, or even the discussion about whether or not there are useful anti-missile measures. What stands out is how the news media refuses to call al-Qaeda terrorists.
3 posted on 11/28/2002 8:41:14 PM PST by twntaipan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: twntaipan
What stands out is how the news media refuses to call al-Qaeda terrorists.

"The weapon is so simple to operate that experts were puzzled how the terrorists managed to miss their target yesterday. ...

Earlier this year, evidence emerged that al-Qaida militants had access to heat-seeking SAM-7s. ...

The discovery prompted the FBI to issue an intelligence warning that terrorists could use shoulder-fired missiles to shoot down US commercial aircraft. ...

These include the US-made Stinger system, which was used to devastating effect by Afghan mohajedin fighters against Soviet occupying forces."

Actually, they sort of do call the Al Qaeda terrorists, although they are termed "militants" as well. Of course, they were "mohajedin" "freedom fighters" during the Regan administration when we were supplying them with the anti-aircraft missiles.

4 posted on 11/28/2002 8:52:33 PM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
What stands out is how the news media refuses to call al-Qaeda terrorists.

It's not yet totally clear in this case that the terrorists are in fact Al Qaeda. Given the target, they could also be Palestinians. BTW, the article does call the perps terrorists.

6 posted on 11/28/2002 9:14:34 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson