Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate does not truly represent population
Rocky Mountain Collegian (Colorado State U.) ^ | 12/18/2002 | Rod Rodriguez

Posted on 12/19/2002 1:58:30 PM PST by NorCoGOP

FORT COLLINS, Colo. -- Power. Control. Privilege. Old, white, straight, Christian men. These are the power-holders in our society.

It's funny. Just a couple of weeks ago, my "feminist" best friend made the comment, "I don't understand why I act more like a man than he does." She was referring to another friend of hers whom she felt was becoming "over-emotional."

"Why does he have to act like a man to be strong? Why can't women be strong?" Ding. The light went on.

Driving ever so slowly through Old Town last night, I looked at the sparkling lights and the Christmas trees put up in storefront windows. I saw Candy Canes, plastic Santa statues, and Christmas wreaths. Then it hit me. What if I wasn't a Christian? How would I feel walking alone in a crowd? Ding.

Just for fun, I browsed www.senate.gov and looked at who our senators are. Did you know that there are 11 women senators? And only 3 of them are Republican? Considering the Senate voted 99-0 to support a resolution to keep the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, I would speculate that most of the Senate is Christian with only one Jewish member.

There are no "out" senators, the first woman wasn't elected until the Depression Era, and the first Asian-American to serve in our Senate wasn't voted in until 1959, and he was from Hawaii.

Did I also mention that our past presidents have all been White Protestant men, only one being Catholic, and he was assassinated? So where are our people of color? Where are the women and non-Christian people? Doesn't it seem strange to anyone that women, who make up 51 percent of our country, are considered a minority? So where are all of the minorities?

They must have missed the memo stating that they can pull themselves up by their bootstraps.

So for fun, I decided to put together a little representation of what our Senate would look like should it actually represent the people it is representing.

Out of 100 members, there would be: 51 women, 49 men. There would be 12 people of Hispanic/Latino decent, 13 African-Americans, four Asians, Ben Nighthorse-Cambell would retain his job as the only Native-American, five would not declare their race, two would be bi-racial and the last spot would be occupied by a Pacific-Islander.

Of our 100 senators, 10 would be gay, lesbian, or bisexual and we would have one transgender senator who would most likely be from Colorado since this state performs the most sexual-reassignment surgeries in the nation.

Only 63 senators would actively affiliate with a faith-group, 23 of them would be Catholic. 36 senators would be Protestant, representing 220 denominations. There would also be one Muslim and two Jewish senators. The sixty-third seat would belong to the Eastern religions and a whopping 14 seats would go to the atheists and agnostics. The remaining seats would be a toss-up between those who do not subscribe to any particular religion, and only one out of three of our senators would actually attend religious services.

20 of our senators would have a disability.

So back to what our Senate actually looks like: 99 to 0, 11 women, one African-American and no "out" senators. I'm sure that our government will remove themselves from office by making it easier for minority groups to actually attain power and have a voice in our government. Right.

I guess until that time, we're all just going to have to grab hold of our bootstraps and pull real hard. I just wish I had some boots.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barf; gag; holdmuhsphinxter; retch; spew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 12/19/2002 1:58:30 PM PST by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Try as this liberal might, he just can't blame republicans or Bush for this. It's the electorate. It's how the votes go...

If he doesn't like it, he can only blame the population of voters in the USA. It's not like these senators are appointed anymore (except for some democrats lately).
2 posted on 12/19/2002 2:00:55 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Hint: The Senate's not supposed to "represent the population." It's supposed to represent a sober and independent deliberative body that is immune to the viscissitudes of whole-body elections. The House is supposed to represent the population.
3 posted on 12/19/2002 2:01:39 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Ooooo ... puke! Where's the barf alert?
4 posted on 12/19/2002 2:01:59 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
I used to read the Collegian for humor content.
5 posted on 12/19/2002 2:05:24 PM PST by k2blader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Well spank my a$$ and call me "Charlie."
6 posted on 12/19/2002 2:05:58 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
I b'lieve you're using an outmoded standard for the percentage of gay/lesbian/TG in the population at large. One group had claimed 10% back many years ago, but that's since been shown (no, I don't have a source handy) to be more like 2-3%.

But we still get your point - and I'm amongst those who reject it. The Senate is not meant to be an Upper House Of Representatives.

Michael

7 posted on 12/19/2002 2:07:17 PM PST by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Hey Mr. Reporter, you've come up with a great idea.

So good, in fact, that we should apply it to other fields of endeavor. Journalism, perhaps.

You, being the fair minded journalist you are and going by the results of the last election, would probably say that out of 100 journalists, there should be a roughly 51/49 split rep. to dem.

What's that you say? 89 of the 100 voted for XXXlinton? Gee, I'd guess you've got some work to do then in your OWN profession - before you stick your nose elsewhere.

8 posted on 12/19/2002 2:07:58 PM PST by KeyBored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Considering the Senate voted 99-0 to support a resolution to keep the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, I would speculate that most of the Senate is Christian with only one Jewish member.

Jewish people are athiests? You learn something new every day. < /sarcasm>

9 posted on 12/19/2002 2:07:59 PM PST by KarlInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
My Senators don't represent me, they are both female and Socialists, I want to exchange at least one of them for something besides a Socialist.
10 posted on 12/19/2002 2:08:11 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Senate does not truly represent population

The Senate was never intended to represent the populace; it was intended to represent the States. The federal government would be far better off if U.S. senators were appointed by the individual state governors or elected by state assemblies.
11 posted on 12/19/2002 2:09:46 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Got news for Mr. Rodriguez. The Senate was never intended to represent the people (at least not before the 17th amendment). The people's representatives are elected by the people to the House of Representatives. The Senators were originally to be appointed by the state legislatures and were supposed to represent the interests of the states to the federal government. Among other things, they were designed to be guardians of the Republic and the Constitution and to serve as a check against the people.
12 posted on 12/19/2002 2:10:31 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Re: I just wish I had some boots.

That's what she said when I let her up...

13 posted on 12/19/2002 2:10:55 PM PST by sonofatpatcher2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Maybe this person should spend a bit more time in American history, government.. especially the Constitution. The Senate represents a State's interest.

If we could only return Senate elections to state legislature where they belong, get rid of this publically elected foolishness, perhaps there wouldn't as much ignorance of this issue as there is.

14 posted on 12/19/2002 2:13:29 PM PST by VetoBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Senate does not truly represent population

It isn't supposed to -- that's the House's job. The Senate is supposed to represent the States.

-PJ

15 posted on 12/19/2002 2:17:57 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
You said it!
16 posted on 12/19/2002 2:17:58 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
I guess if the Senate truly represented the population, 50 senators would have IQs less than 100 (since by definition, 50% of the population has an IQ less than 100).
Oh! Wait a minute! It's true!
17 posted on 12/19/2002 2:26:47 PM PST by RemainCALM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Monty22
If anyone's to blame, it's the Democrats. They are the party that gets most of the women's votes, almost all of the black and homo votes, so they should have nominated more women, black, and homo senatorial candidates.
19 posted on 12/19/2002 2:32:33 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Not that we should play this moron's silly game but his numbers are way off. His assumption that there is only one Jewish senator is wrong. In the current, 107th, Congress, there are 9. They are: Feinstein, Boxer, Chuckie Cheese Schumer, Feingold, Levin, Kohl, Arlen "Not Proven" Specter, Wyden and Lieberman. And there was Wellstone.

Also, there are disabled people including various wounded veterans. There are also mentally disabled people but they would take too much typing to list.
20 posted on 12/19/2002 2:38:51 PM PST by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson