Well, lets see.
So why dont you make this easy and just post the compelling, valid, and peer-reviewed evidence that supports your assertion of sexual orientation as a pathology? Go ahead make your case.
You go right ahead mad gay, and Ill just keep asserting the DSM II which is compelling, valid, and peer-reviewed evidence that specifically ANSWERS your question. Other versions of the DSM dont disprove, rebut or refute the compelling, valid, and peer-reviewed evidence that you ask for.
your minority opinion
Yes, a VOTE of science, hehe, 58% to 42% of over 10,000 psychiatrists is a minority, but it still doesnt constitute your laughable conclusion that it is SCIENCE.