Skip to comments.
Connecting the War on Guns & Drugs [my title]
SHOTGUN NEWS
^
| 1/11/03
| Amicus Populi
Posted on 01/11/2003 10:15:11 AM PST by tpaine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 741-748 next last
To: Wonder Warthog
There is no right to regulate or ban either drugs or alcohol in the Constitution George Washington and the Founding Fathers disagreed with your ill-informed viewpoint. Ever hear of the Whiskey Rebellion?
61
posted on
01/11/2003 4:36:43 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
The whiskey rebellion was mainly about taxes. - Read a book.
62
posted on
01/11/2003 4:43:10 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
Only an idiot would think that you can tax an item without regulations.
63
posted on
01/11/2003 4:57:13 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Wonder Warthog:
"There is no right to regulate or ban either drugs or alcohol in the Constitution."
George Washington and the Founding Fathers disagreed with your ill-informed viewpoint. Ever hear of the Whiskey Rebellion?
61 -roscoe-
Only an idiot would characterize WW's viewpoint as "ill-informed".
64
posted on
01/11/2003 5:04:22 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
To: thisiskubrick
66
posted on
01/11/2003 5:11:13 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
"George Washington and the Founding Fathers disagreed with your ill-informed viewpoint. Ever hear of the Whiskey Rebellion?" Yup, I sure have. The Whiskey Rebellion wasn't about banning or regulating liquor--it was about laying and collecting a tax on it. Same logic as was used to TAX (not ban) fully automatic firearms when that law was passed back in the 1930's. And, just to reinforce the ACCURACY of the connection between the Drug War and the pending Gun confiscation, the fedgov has no Constitutional power to ban "assault weapons" either.
The Constitutionally illegal "War on Drugs" and the equally unConstitutional but just beginning "War on Guns" both point out that the anti-Federalists were right--the chains binding the federal government were NOT strong enough.
To: tpaine
"Not so, under the Supremacy clause, or under 'due process' of the 14th. - States can no more prohibit drugs, -- than they can guns. -- Study the threads posted article." Well, I had in mind the pre-Civil War Constitution, but wrt the 14th Amendment, I agree with your (and Justice Harlan's) position
To: thisiskubrick
thisiskubrick signed up 2002-09-01.
GOD BLESS AMERICA! SUPPPORT MY EFFORTS TO HAVE EVERY SCHOOL CHILD IN AMERICA RECITE THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TWICE PER DAY AND TO WEAR AN AMERICAN FLAG PIN ON ALTERNATING SUNDAYS TO SUPPORT FREEDOM. Send money to: Stan Kubrick The Pledge Foundation 937 West Main Street Riverton, Wyoming 82501
'Stan', -- I really wish you would avoid posting inane graphics.
It's a form of spamming a thread, imo. Please, if you object to something here, have the guts to say so. -- Unless you enjoy being in the same league as roscoe, cultural jihad, & cohort.
69
posted on
01/11/2003 5:27:15 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Wonder Warthog
The Whiskey Rebellion wasn't about banning or regulating liquor Stills had to be licensed, barrels had to stamped, logbooks had to be kept on site. Only an idiot would think that you can tax an item without regulations.
70
posted on
01/11/2003 5:28:17 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Wonder Warthog
Thanks. -- And regards.
71
posted on
01/11/2003 5:29:26 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Roscoe
Ironic that US Grant was the president during the Whiskey rebellion ...
To: Roscoe
Semantics
73
posted on
01/11/2003 5:33:36 PM PST
by
tpaine
(Petty minds play semantic games)
To: clamper1797
Ironic that US Grant was the president during the Whiskey rebellion ...
LOL! Whiskey Rebellion: 1794.
Ulysses S. Grant: Born in 1822.
Bonus question: "Who is buried in Grant's Tomb?"
To: clamper1797
Ironic that US Grant was the president during the Whiskey rebellion ... = Ironic that US Grant was NOT the president during the Whiskey rebellion ....
It was meant as a joke
To: clamper1797
President Grant(?) reviewing the troops during the Whiskey Rebellion
To: clamper1797
It was (not) meant as a joke
OIC
To: tpaine
Then you should realise that supporting the drug war works against your self interest.Who said I support the drug war? Where are you reading THAT from? You're all over the road.
78
posted on
01/11/2003 6:51:17 PM PST
by
Puppage
To: Puppage
Then you should realise that supporting the drug war works against your self interest.
Who said I support the drug war? Where are you reading THAT from? You're all over the road.
Legalization is not the way.
14 posted on 01/11/2003 11:22 AM PST by Puppage
Sorry, the FACT that I do not agree with the legalization of drugs does NOT make me a socialist.
36 posted on 01/11/2003 2:46 PM PST by Puppage
________________________________
Case closed. --- Make up another story.
79
posted on
01/11/2003 7:06:34 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Cultural Jihad
CJ, this is a major triumph for you & roscoe!!
You have proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that G. Washington was President before that whiskey soaked U.S. Grant even thought about stealing the strawberries.
80
posted on
01/11/2003 7:14:22 PM PST
by
tpaine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 741-748 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson