[Puppage]

'Drugs' were 'legal' for most of US history

So? Lots of "things" were legal at one point in our countries history...doesn't mean because they ONCE WERE, that we were better off then.

They have been prohibited by unconstituional methods, which point you refuse to acknowledge

Just WHERE in my previous post do I acknowlege, or NOT acknowledge this "point", oh legal scholar???

[tpaine]

'Drugs' were 'legal' for most of US history. - They have been prohibited by unconstituional methods, which point you refuse to acknowledge. Are you a socialist, or a conservative? -- You cannot be a 'conservative' prohibitionist. 19 -tpaine-

So? Lots of "things" were legal at one point in our countries history...doesn't mean because they ONCE WERE, that we were better off then.

You are arguing that the WOD's has made us 'better off'? How?

----------------------------

They have been prohibited by unconstituional methods, which point you [apparently] refuse to acknowledge. [corrrected]

Just WHERE in my previous post do I acknowlege, or NOT acknowledge this "point", oh legal scholar???

You got me, oh pedantic one!!! Big deal.

[Oztrich Boy]

So? Lots of "things" were legal at one point in our countries history...doesn't mean because they ONCE WERE, that we were better off then.

And that argument works just as well when used against the right to poosess guns