[tpaine]

Unconstitutional search and seizures are not permissible by any government.
Prohibition of dangerous substances are permissible by states.
-ta79-

You have a real problem with logic.
The reasonable regulation of dangerous substances are permissible by states. -- This is a given.
Outright prohibitions on 'dangerous' property by any level of government, have been well demonstrated on this thread as being against the very principles of our free republic, & our constitution.
Your inability to acknowlege that this fact works against your own freedom is telling.
Only fanatics for a 'cause' are so blind. What is your cause aggie?
-- Are you rational enough to tell us, to explain?

[Texaggie79]

Simply because hard drugs are prohibited does not, in no way, mean that unconstitutional searches and seizures will take place. If you are caught selling, go to jail. If you are caught buying, go to treatment or jail. If you are caught (in a constitutional manner such as probable cause and warrant) possessing then you go to jail or treatment. Nothing unconstitutional.

[Roscoe]

Outright prohibitions on 'dangerous' property by any level of government, have been well demonstrated on this thread

Question begging isn't demonstrating. You have yet produce so much as a single case, law or authority of any kind in support of your bogus assertion.

And you never will.