Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudis Deny Plan To Oust Saddam
Independent (UK) ^ | 1-19-2003 | Adel Darwish

Posted on 01/18/2003 4:04:12 PM PST by blam

Saudis deny plan to oust Saddam

By Adel Darwish in Kuwait City
19 January 2003

Saudi Arabia has denied the existence of a plan to oust Saddam Hussein, as Kuwait, from which Iraqi forces were driven during the last Gulf War in 1991, anticipates another conflict pitting the West against its dangerous neighbour.

The Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Nawaf bin Abdul-Aziz, said reports that the Saudis were proposing an amnesty for Iraqi generals close to Saddam to encourage a coup against him were "totally baseless". The prince said the kingdom "would not interfere in the internal affairs of Iraq and has no contacts with Iraqis inside or outside".

In Kuwait, unlike most of the Middle East, there is overwhelming support for the removal of the Iraqi dictator, and Kuwaitis are mystified and concerned by the public debate in Britain over the desirability of war. "It is not enough just to disarm Saddam," one local columnist wrote.

Kuwaiti newspapers are much freer than most in the Arab world, and also less critical of American policy in the region. "They are aware of their reliance on American military power as the main tool to get rid of Saddam," a Western diplomat observed.

Kuwaitis also want Britain to be closely involved, militarily and politically, in any campaign. One official claimed the Americans were unlikely to have the stomach for the number of casualties needed to march all the way to Baghdad. "I know the British would," he added. "That is why we would feel much more confident if the British were here with us and with the Americans on the front line."

Senior Kuwaiti sources said they feared a post-Saddam leadership might revive the old Iraqi claim to the small, oil-rich state. One official, pointing out that Britain had saved Kuwait from invasion as far back as 1920, said: "We are grateful that America led the coalition that liberated our nation 12 years ago, but we have much longer historic ties with Britain. Time and again, London has protected our independence."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deny; oust; plan; saddam; saudis

1 posted on 01/18/2003 4:04:12 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Tom Daschle, This One's For You!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/18/2003 4:05:52 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
One official claimed the Americans were unlikely to have the stomach for the number of casualties needed to march all the way to Baghdad.

Another Clinton legacy.

3 posted on 01/18/2003 4:13:58 PM PST by Air Assault (Got Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I don't see Kuwait as having anything to worry about.

Can you imagine the uproar here if we invaded Iraq and helped them take over Kuwait?

George W Bush isn't going to damage his father's legacy in that way. I would bet the farm on that.

D

4 posted on 01/18/2003 4:15:28 PM PST by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson